Conventional biventricular pacing is still preferred to conduction system pacing for atrioventricular block in patients with reduced ejection fraction and narrow QRS

Author:

Glikson Michael1ORCID,Jastrzebski Marek2ORCID,Gold Michael R3ORCID,Ellenbogen Kenneth4ORCID,Burri Haran5ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Jesselson Integrated Heart Center, Shaare Zedek Medical Center and Hebrew University Faculty of Medicine , Jerusalem , Israel

2. First Department of Cardiology, Interventional Electrocardiology and Hypertension, Jagiellonian University, Medical College , Jakubowskiego 2, 30-688 Krakow , Poland

3. Virginia Commonwealth University, VCU Medical Center Gateway Building , 1200 E. Marshall Street, Richmond, VA 23219 , USA

4. MUSC Division of Cardiology , Medical University of South Carolina, 25 Courtenay Dr, MS-592, Charleston, SC 29425 , USA

5. Cardiac Pacing Unit, Cardiology Department, University Hospital of Geneva , Rue Gabrielle Perret Gentil 4, 1211, Geneva , Switzerland

Abstract

Abstract It is well established that right ventricular pacing is detrimental in patients with reduced cardiac function who require ventricular pacing (VP), and alternatives nowadays are comprised of biventricular pacing (BiVP) and conduction system pacing (CSP). The latter modality is of particular interest in patients with a narrow baseline QRS as it completely avoids, or minimizes, ventricular desynchronization associated with VP. In this article, experts debate whether BiVP or CSP should be used to treat these patients.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Physiology (medical),Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3