Efficacy and safety of remote magnetic catheter navigation vs. manual steerable sheath-guided ablation for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: a case-control study-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Efficacy and safety of remote magnetic catheter navigation vs. manual steerable sheath-guided ablation for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: a case-control study

Published:2014-10-21 Issue:2 Volume:17 Page:232-238
ISSN:1099-5129
Container-title:Europace
language:en
Short-container-title:Europace

Author:

Koutalas E.,Bertagnolli L.,Sommer P.,Richter S.,Rolf S.,Breithardt O.,Bollmann A.,Hindricks G.,Arya A.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Physiology (medical),Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Reference24 articles.

1. 2012 focused update of the ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation

2. 2012 HRS/EHRA/ECAS Expert Consensus Statement on Catheter and Surgical Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation: Recommendations for Patient Selection, Procedural Techniques, Patient Management and Follow-up, Definitions, Endpoints, and Research Trial Design: A report of the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) Task Force on Catheter and Surgical Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation. Developed in partnership with the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA), a registered branch of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Cardiac Arrhythmia Society (ECAS); and in collaboration with the American College of Cardiology (ACC), American Heart Association (AHA), the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS), and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS). Endorsed by the governing bodies of the American College of Cardiology Foundation, the American Heart Association, the European Cardiac Arrhythmia Society, the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Society of Thoracic Surgeons, the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, and the Heart Rhythm Society

3. Remote Magnetic Navigation

4. Feasibility and Safety of Remote-Controlled Magnetic Navigation for Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation

5. Catheter Ablation of Scar-Related Ventricular Tachycardia in Patients with Electrical Storm Using Remote Magnetic Catheter Navigation

Cited by 15 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Contact force sensing manual catheter versus remote magnetic navigation ablation of atrial fibrillation: a single-center comparison;Heart and Vessels;2024-01-08

2. Robotic magnetic navigation-guided pulmonary vein isolation in an atrial fibrillation patient with dextrocardia situs inversus: techniques and potential advantages;BMC Cardiovascular Disorders;2023-05-20

3. Magnetic Navigation System Compared to Manual Navigation for Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: A Systematic Review and Met analysis;Journal of Atrial Fibrillation and Electrophysiology;2022-05

4. Utilization of steerable sheath improves the efficiency of atrial fibrillation ablation guided by robotic magnetic navigation compared with fixed‐curve sheath;Clinical Cardiology;2022-02-23

5. Remote magnetic navigation versus manual catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: A single center long‐term comparison;Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology;2021-10-31