SCREENING MAMMOGRAPHY: DIAGNOSTIC EFFICACY—ISSUES AND CONSIDERATIONS FOR THE 2020S

Author:

Hooshmand Sahand1ORCID,Reed Warren M1,Suleiman Mo'ayyad E1,Brennan Patrick C1

Affiliation:

1. Faculty of Medicine and Health, The Discipline of Medical Imaging Sciences, The University of Sydney, Susan Wakil Health Building (D18), Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia

Abstract

Abstract Diagnostic efficacy in medical imaging is ultimately a reflection of radiologist performance. This can be influenced by numerous factors, some of which are patient related, such as the physical size and density of the breast, and machine related, where some lesions are difficult to visualise on traditional imaging techniques. Other factors are human reader errors that occur during the diagnostic process, which relate to reader experience and their perceptual and cognitive oversights. Given the large-scale nature of breast cancer screening, even small increases in diagnostic performance equate to large numbers of women saved. It is important to identify the causes of diagnostic errors and how detection efficacy can be improved. This narrative review will therefore explore the various factors that influence mammographic performance and the potential solutions used in an attempt to ameliorate the errors made.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging,General Medicine,Radiation,Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

Reference94 articles.

1. Reassessment of breast cancers missed during routine screening mammography: a community-based study;Yankaskas;AJR Am. J. Roentgenol.,2001

2. Errors in mammography cannot be solved through technology alone;Ekpo;Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev.,2018

3. Breast composition: measurement and clinical use;Ekpo;Radiography,2015

4. Breast density and the importance of supplemental screening;Weber;Curr. Breast Cancer Reports.,2018

5. Individual and combined effects of age, breast density, and hormone replacement therapy use on the accuracy of screening mammography;Carney;Ann. Intern. Med.,2003

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3