NATIONWIDE SURVEY OF RADIATION EXPOSURE FOR RADIOFREQUENCY CATHETER ABLATION FOR PULMONARY VEIN ISOLATION AND NONPULMONARY VEIN ISOLATION IN JAPAN-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

NATIONWIDE SURVEY OF RADIATION EXPOSURE FOR RADIOFREQUENCY CATHETER ABLATION FOR PULMONARY VEIN ISOLATION AND NONPULMONARY VEIN ISOLATION IN JAPAN

Published:2022-01 Issue:1-2 Volume:198 Page:16-22
ISSN:0144-8420
Container-title:Radiation Protection Dosimetry
language:en
Short-container-title:

Author:

Ishibashi Toru¹^ORCID,Masuda Takanori¹^ORCID,Kato Mamoru²,Yamashita Yukari¹,Takei Yasutaka³,Tsukamoto Atsuko⁴,Matsumoto Kazuma⁵,Sakamoto Hajime⁶^ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Radiological Technology, Tsuchiya General Hospital, Nakajima-cho 3-30, Naka-ku, Hiroshima 730-8655, Japan

2. Department of Radiological Technology, Tsuchiya General Hospital, 3-30 Nakajima-cho, Naka-ku, Hiroshima 730-8655, Japan

3. Department of Radiological Technology, Faculty of Health Science and Technology, 288 Matsushima, Kurashiki-City, Okayama 701-0193, Japan

4. Department of Radiology, NTT Medical Center Tokyo, 5-9-22 Higashi-Gotanda, Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo 141-8625, Japan

5. Department of Clinical Radiology, Hyogo College of Medicine College Hospital, 1-3-6 Minatojima, Chuo-ku, Kobe City, Hyogo 663-8501, Japan

6. Department of Radiological Technology, Faculty of Health Science, Juntendo University, 2-1-1 Hongo, bunkyou-ku, Tokyo 113-8421, Japan

Abstract

Abstract To propose typical values for the arrhythmia region between pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) and nonpulmonary vein isolation (non-PVI) in Japan. A nationwide questionnaire was posted to 343 facilities, to which 125 facilities (36.4%) responded. Results is the median for PVI and non-PVI were in terms of Ka,r (317 and 196 mGy), PKA (40.8 and 26.3 Gy.cm2), FT (43.0 and 27.3 min), and CI (326 and 102 images). When comparing PVI and non-PVI procedures, there were significant differences in Ka, r, PKA, FT, and CI (p < 0.05). In other words, by classifying into two types, PVI and non-PVI, we contributed to the establishment of typical values in Japan’s RFCA.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging,General Medicine,Radiation,Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

Link

https://academic.oup.com/rpd/article-pdf/198/1-2/16/42548625/ncab185.pdf

Reference19 articles.

1. Diagnostic reference levels;Vassileva;AJR Am. J. Roentgenol.,2015

2. Nationwide survey of radiation exposure during pediatric computed tomography examinations and proposal of age-based diagnostic reference levels for Japan;Takei;Pediatr. Radiol.,2016

3. Radiation dose in coronary angiography and intervention: initial results from the establishment of a multi-centre diagnostic reference level in Queensland public hospitals;Crowhurst;J. Med. Radiat. Sci.,2014

4. The National Diagnostic Reference Level in routine digital radiography examinations in Iran;Deevband;Biomed. J. Sci.Tech. Res.,2018

5. A preliminary study to determine the diagnostic reference level using dose-area product for limited-area cone beam CT;Endo;Dentomaxillofacial Radiol.,2013