Asking about Social Circles Improves Election Predictions Even with Many Political Parties

Author:

Bruine de Bruin Wändi1ORCID,Galesic Mirta2,Bååth Rasmus3,de Bresser Jochem4,Hall Lars3,Johansson Petter3,Strandberg Thomas3,van Soest Arthur4

Affiliation:

1. University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States

2. Santa Fe Institute, Santa Fe, NM, United States

3. Lund University Cognitive Science, Lund, Sweden

4. Tilburg School of Economics and Management, Tilburg University, Tilburg, the Netherlands

Abstract

Abstract Traditionally, election polls have asked for participants’ own voting intentions. In four elections, we previously found that we could improve predictions by asking participants how they thought their social circles would vote. A potential concern is that the social-circle question might predict results less well in elections with larger numbers of political options because it becomes harder to accurately track how social contacts plan to vote. However, we now find that the social-circle question performs better than the own-intention question in predicting two elections with many political parties: The Netherlands’ 2017 general election and the Swedish 2018 general election.

Funder

Swedish Foundation

Humanities and the Social Sciences

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Sociology and Political Science

Reference14 articles.

1. A new multinomial accuracy measure for polling bias;Arzheimer;Political Analysis,2014

2. Reports of social circles’ and own vaccination behavior: A national longitudinal survey;Bruine de Bruin;Health Psychology,2019

3. Network items and the general social survey;Burt;Social Networks,1984

4. The predictive power of probabilities: Probabilistic and deterministic polling in the Dutch 2017 election;De Bresser;Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society),2019

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Social Sampling for Judgments and Predictions of Societal Trends;Sampling in Judgment and Decision Making;2023-06-15

2. Sampling as a Tool in Social Environments;Sampling in Judgment and Decision Making;2023-06-15

3. On an effective and efficient method for exploiting the wisdom of the inner crowd;Scientific Reports;2023-03-03

4. With a little help from my friends? The impact of social networks on citizens' forecasting ability;European Journal of Political Research;2022-12-08

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3