Is Science for the Rich and Powerful? Investigating the Relation Between Income and Trust in Science Across 145 Countries

Author:

Fuglsang Simon1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Danish Centre for Studies in Research and Research Policy, Department of Political Science, Aarhus BSS, Aarhus University , Aarhus C , Denmark

Abstract

Abstract Prior research indicates that income relates to trust in science. However, no prior studies exclusively focus on this relationship, leaving questions on the characteristics and universality of the relationship unanswered. This study enriches our understanding of the relationship between individual-level income and trust in science on 3 fronts. First, this study explicates income into the dimensions of relative income (objective economic status) and subjective income (perceived economic hardship and satisfaction). Second, it provides a global overview by assessing the aforementioned relationship across 145 countries, investigating whether the relationship is universal or contingent on country-level characteristics. Third, the study investigates moderators at country and individual-level. Results indicate that subjective income is more strongly related to trust in science than relative income and that it is strongest in previously studied populations. The relationship is moderated by institutional quality (which increases the relationship) and economic climate (GDP per capita increasing the relationship) at the country-level, and science efficacy (increasing the relationship) and trust in government (decreasing the relationship) at the individual-level.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Sociology and Political Science

Reference81 articles.

1. Science knowledge and attitudes across cultures: A meta-analysis;Allum;Public Understanding of Science,2008

2. Effect of income on trust: Evidence from the 2009 crisis in Russia;Ananyev,2016

3. The replicability crisis and public trust in psychological science;Anvari;Comprehensive Results in Social Psychology,2019

4. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4;Bates;arXiv preprint arXiv:1406.5823,2014

5. The two-edged sword of skepticism: Occam’s razor and Occam’s lobotomy;Bauer;Journal of Scientific Exploration,2006

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3