Affiliation:
1. Life Sciences Communication Department, University of Wisconsin–Madison, USA
2. Department of Communication and Media, University of Michigan, USA
Abstract
Abstract
Partisans appear to hold very different information about climate change, with Republicans more likely to respond to knowledge questions incorrectly than Democrats or Independents. As polarization undermines the ability of science to inform policy, clarifying why partisans report different science knowledge is vital. This study uses novel measurement to differentiate among knowledge, misinformation, guessing, and rejection while identifying covariates of these cognitions. First, we find that Republicans’ incorrect beliefs about climate change stem from a mix of guessing, misperceptions, and rejection. Second, multiple cognitions appear closely linked to partisanship, suggesting politically motivated reasoning as likely driving knowledge differences. Finally, partisan knowledge differences about climate change do not reflect broader polarization of science knowledge but are limited to select issues.
Funder
Marsh Fund of the Communication and Media Department at the University of Michigan
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
Sociology and Political Science
Reference45 articles.
1. The theory of planned behavior;Ajzen;Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,1991
2. The unbearable lightness of politics: Climate change denial and political polarization;Antonio;The Sociological Quarterly,2016
3. Summary report of the AAPOR task force on non-probability sampling;Baker;Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology,2013
4. Climate change and journalistic norms: A case-study of US mass-media coverage;Boykoff,2007
5. Partisan bias in factual beliefs about politics (No. 19080). nber.org;Bullock,2013
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献