Some Deficits and Some Misperceptions: Linking Partisanship With Climate Change Cognitions

Author:

Chinn Sedona1ORCID,Pasek Josh2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Life Sciences Communication Department, University of Wisconsin–Madison, USA

2. Department of Communication and Media, University of Michigan, USA

Abstract

Abstract Partisans appear to hold very different information about climate change, with Republicans more likely to respond to knowledge questions incorrectly than Democrats or Independents. As polarization undermines the ability of science to inform policy, clarifying why partisans report different science knowledge is vital. This study uses novel measurement to differentiate among knowledge, misinformation, guessing, and rejection while identifying covariates of these cognitions. First, we find that Republicans’ incorrect beliefs about climate change stem from a mix of guessing, misperceptions, and rejection. Second, multiple cognitions appear closely linked to partisanship, suggesting politically motivated reasoning as likely driving knowledge differences. Finally, partisan knowledge differences about climate change do not reflect broader polarization of science knowledge but are limited to select issues.

Funder

Marsh Fund of the Communication and Media Department at the University of Michigan

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Sociology and Political Science

Reference45 articles.

1. The theory of planned behavior;Ajzen;Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,1991

2. The unbearable lightness of politics: Climate change denial and political polarization;Antonio;The Sociological Quarterly,2016

3. Summary report of the AAPOR task force on non-probability sampling;Baker;Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology,2013

4. Climate change and journalistic norms: A case-study of US mass-media coverage;Boykoff,2007

5. Partisan bias in factual beliefs about politics (No. 19080). nber.org;Bullock,2013

Cited by 7 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3