Conceptualizing and Operationalizing Collaboration Among Multiple Caregivers of Older Adults

Author:

Ellis Katrina R12ORCID,Koumoutzis Athena3,Lewis Jordan P4ORCID,Lin Zhiyong5ORCID,Zhou Yuanjin6ORCID,Chopik William J7,Gonzalez Richard28

Affiliation:

1. School of Social Work, University of Michigan , Ann Arbor, Michigan , USA

2. Research Center for Group Dynamics, Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan , Ann Arbor, Michigan , USA

3. Department of Sociology and Gerontology, Miami University , Oxford, Ohio , USA

4. University of Minnesota Medical School, Duluth Campus , Duluth, Minnesota , USA

5. Department of Sociology, University of Texas at San Antonio , San Antonio, Texas , USA

6. Steve Hicks School of Social Work, the University of Texas at Austin , Austin, Texas , USA

7. Department of Psychology, Michigan State University , East Lansing, Michigan , USA

8. Department of Psychology, University of Michigan , Ann Arbor, Michigan , USA

Abstract

Abstract Objectives In many families, multiple caregivers support older adults living with dementia. Studying collaboration among caregivers requires consideration of conceptual and methodological issues that have not been fully explored. This study presents a framework for conceptualizing caregiver collaboration and an index that captures variation in collaboration among multiple caregivers within care networks. Methods We used data from the 2015 waves of the National Health and Aging Trends Study and National Study of Caregiving (NSOC) to operationalize collaboration among multiple caregivers (N = 1,298) of 552 care recipients (Mage = 83.69, SD = 7.73; 71.6% women; 47.9% possible/probable dementia; 38.9% people of color). Results The care collaboration index considered individual and overlapping contributions while controlling for the size of the care network (caregivers in network responding to NSOC survey) and total network size (number of caregivers in network) in the statistical model. Larger care networks enabled more collaboration, both in general and across most types of tasks (βs > 0.38). Collaboration was greater among those caring for a Black or Hispanic care recipient, both in general and for household and medical/health tasks specifically (βs > 0.11). Collaboration was also greater among those caring for recipients with probable dementia, both in general and for most tasks (βs > 0.11) but not transportation-related tasks (p = .219). Discussion Results are examined in the context of care network dynamics and proposed mechanisms linking care collaboration to outcomes for caregivers and recipients. Strengths and limitations of our conceptualization and operationalization of collaboration are discussed.

Funder

National Institute on Aging

Michigan Center for Contextual Factors in Alzheimer’s Disease

National Cancer Institute

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Geriatrics and Gerontology,Gerontology,Clinical Psychology,Social Psychology

Reference50 articles.

1. Patterns of caregiving among older adults with and without dementia: A latent class analysis;Ali;The Journals of Gerontology, Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences,2022

2. 2020 Alzheimer’s disease facts and figures;Alzheimer’s Association.;Alzheimer’s & Dementia,2020

3. Informal care networks in the context of multimorbidity: Size, composition, and associations with recipient psychological well-being;Andersson;Journal of Aging and Health,2018

4. Perceived discrimination and mortality in a population-based study of older adults;Barnes;American Journal of Public Health,2008

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3