Does Age Matter? Tweets About Gerontocracy in the United States

Abstract

Abstract Objectives Discussions on the political scene in the United States have been accompanied by the notion that the country has morphed into a gerontocracy, a system of governance where power is wielded predominantly by older individuals. With rising life expectancy, more as well as older candidates are likely to run for and stay in office. This study analyzes perceptions regarding the older political leadership of the United States. Methods We collected 3,599 tweets containing the word “gerontocracy” which were uploaded between September 10, 2022 and November 10, 2022, a month prior to the midterm elections in the United States, when this topic was likely to have sparked considerable discussion. After applying our exclusion criteria, 1,266 tweets were retained. Our qualitative content analysis was performed inductively and deductively. Results Seven themes emerged. Most tweets (24%; N = 304) highlighted that “Gerontocracy is a Problem” (Theme 1). Theme 2 (21%) focused on how “Democracy is a Sham” (N = 270). Theme 3 (19%) positioned “Old Age as the Problem and Youth as the Solution” (N = 234). Theme 4 (11%) was about how “The Future is at Stake” (N = 145). “Health Concerns” dominated Theme 5 (10%; N = 126). Theme 6 looked at “Structural Reforms” (9%, N = 115). Theme 7 “In Defense of the Gerontocracy” formed 6% of the data set (N = 72). Discussion Attitudes toward older politicians are commonly tied to negative stereotypes surrounding old age. As the population ages, it is paramount that society focuses on potentially more important considerations in the evaluation of the actual caliber of a politician.