Increased Care Provision and Caregiver Wellbeing: Moderation by Changes in Social Network Care Provision

Author:

Kirkegaard Allison1ORCID,Friedman Esther M2ORCID,Edgington Sarah1,Kennedy David1

Affiliation:

1. RAND Corporation , Santa Monica, California , USA

2. Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan at Ann Arbor , Ann Arbor, Michigan , USA

Abstract

Abstract Objectives Previous research links increased care provision to worse wellbeing among family and friend caregivers, both before and during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. We expand on this by incorporating data on caregivers’ social networks and exploring the relationships between own and network changes in care during the pandemic and caregiver wellbeing. Methods We use nationally representative data from 1,876 family and friend caregivers in the first wave of our Care Network Connections over Time study (fielded 12/17/2020–1/4/2021) who had provided care continuously since before the COVID-19 pandemic began. Caregivers were asked about the amount of care that they and each member of their social networks were providing at the time of the survey relative to before the pandemic. We use multivariate regression models to examine the associations between five caregiver wellbeing outcomes and changes in care, and explore the moderating role of networks’ changes in care. Results Among caregivers who had provided care since prior to the pandemic, most increased (42.0%) or maintained the same (40.8%) care. Their networks also typically increased (33.4%) or maintained (46.5%) care. Increasing one’s own care provision was associated with higher levels of anxiety, depression, loneliness, and emotional difficulty than maintaining stable care. Among those who increased care, these levels were highest when the network also increased or decreased care. Discussion Increased care provision was most strongly associated with poor caregiver wellbeing in contexts where caregivers’ social networks also changed care provisions. Supports for caregivers undertaking additional care tasks should take into account caregivers’ networks.

Funder

National Institutes of Health

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Reference49 articles.

1. Elder Care in Crisis

2. Defining distinct caregiver subpopulations by intensity of end-of-life care provided;Abernethy,2009

3. Reliability and cross-country equivalence of the 8-item version of the patient health questionnaire (PHQ-8) for the assessment of depression: Results from 27 countries in Europe;Arias de la Torre,2023

4. Family caregiving during the COVID-19 pandemic;Beach,2021

5. “You feel very isolated”: Effects of COVID-19 pandemic on caregiver social connections;Bristol,2021

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3