Risk of Dementia Differs Across Lifestyle Engagement Subgroups: A Latent Class and Time-to-Event Analysis in Community-Dwelling Older Adults

Author:

Moored Kyle D1ORCID,Bandeen-Roche Karen2,Snitz Beth E3,DeKosky Steven T4,Williamson Jeff D5,Fitzpatrick Annette L6,Carlson Michelle C7ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Epidemiology, University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health, Pennsylvania, USA

2. Department of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA

3. Department of Neurology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pennsylvania, USA

4. Department of Neurology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, USA

5. Department of Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA

6. Departments of Family Medicine, Epidemiology, and Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, USA

7. Department of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA

Abstract

Abstract Objectives Better understanding of the lifestyle activities shared among older adult subgroups may inform further health behavioral interventions that can be deployed at the group or community level. We applied latent class analysis to characterize qualitatively distinct lifestyle engagement groups, examined their differential risk of incident dementia, and compared their predictive utility to traditional activity frequency and variety scores. Method Participants were from the Ginkgo Evaluation of Memory Study (N = 3,068, mean age = 78.5). Lifestyle activities were measured at baseline using the Lifestyle Activity Questionnaire. All-cause dementia was screened every 6 months and cases were clinically adjudicated. Median follow-up was 6 years. Time to dementia was assessed using discrete-time proportional hazards models, adjusted for demographic and health covariates. Results Latent classes provided slightly poorer case discrimination than the frequency scores but identified distinct qualitative subgroups. In the 4-class model, the Variety (22%) and Intellectual (18%) lifestyle groups had high engagement in intellectual activities, whereas the Variety and Social groups (32%) had high engagement in formal social activities. Compared to the Least Active group (28%), the Variety (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.67, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.48, 0.93) and Intellectual (HR = 0.65, 95% CI: 0.45, 0.93) groups had significantly lower risk of incident dementia, but only among those without prevalent mild cognitive impairment. Discussion Older adults highly engaged in intellectual activities, but not necessarily social activities, had the lowest risk of incident dementia. Activity frequency scores provided only slightly better case discrimination than activity variety scores and latent classes. Latent classes of older adults differed by their amount and types of activities, which may inform intervention design.

Funder

National Institute on Aging

National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine

Office of Dietary Supplements

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute

National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke

University of Pittsburgh Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center

Roena Kulynych Center for Memory and Cognition Research

Wake Forest University School of Medicine

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Geriatrics and Gerontology,Gerontology,Clinical Psychology,Social Psychology

Cited by 8 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3