Determining Whether Older Adults Use Similar Strategies to Young Adults in Theory of Mind Tasks

Abstract

Abstract Objectives Theory of mind—the ability to infer others’ mental states—declines over the life span, potentially due to cognitive decline. However, it is unclear whether deficits emerge because older adults use the same strategies as young adults, albeit less effectively, or use different or no strategies. The current study compared the similarity of older adults’ theory of mind errors to young adults’ and a random model. Methods One hundred twenty older adults (MAge = 74.68 years; 64 female) and 111 young adults (MAge = 19.1; 61 female) completed a novel theory of mind task (clips from an episode of the sitcom The Office®), and a standard measure of cognitive function (Logical Memory II). Monte Carlo resampling estimated the likelihood that older adults’ error patterns were more similar to young adults’ or a random distribution. Results Age deficits emerged on the theory of mind task. Poorer performance was associated with less similarity to young adults’ response patterns. Overall, older adults’ response patterns were ~2.7 million times more likely to match young adults’ than a random model. Critically, one fourth of older adults’ errors were more similar to the random distribution. Poorer memory ability contributed to this relationship. Discussion Age deficits in theory of mind performance may be driven by a subset of older adults and be related to disparities in strategy use. A certain amount of cognitive ability may be necessary for older adults to engage similar strategies to young adults’ during theory of mind.