Affiliation:
1. KULeuven and FWO UCLA Anderson School of Management, NBER, and CEPR
Abstract
AbstractWhile human capital is a strong predictor of economic development today, its importance for the Industrial Revolution has typically been assessed as minor. To resolve this puzzling contrast, we differentiate average human capital (literacy) from upper-tail knowledge. As a proxy for the historical presence of knowledge elites, we use city-level subscriptions to the famous Encyclopédie in mid-18th century France. We show that subscriber density is a strong predictor of city growth after the onset of French industrialization. Alternative measures of development such as soldier height, disposable income, and industrial activity confirm this pattern. Initial literacy levels, on the other hand, are associated with development in the cross-section, but they do not predict growth. Finally, by joining data on British patents with a large French firm survey from the 1840s, we shed light on the mechanism: upper-tail knowledge raised productivity in innovative industrial technology.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
Economics and Econometrics
Reference127 articles.
1. “Implementing Matching Estimators for Average Treatment Effects in Stata,”;Abadie;Stata Journal,2004
2. “The Roots of the Industrial Revolution: Political Institutions or (Socially Embedded) Know-How?,”;Abramson
3. “Institutions, Human Capital and Development,”;Acemoglu;Annual Review of Economics,2014
4. “Social Structure and Development: A Legacy of the Holocaust in Russia,”;Acemoglu;Quarterly Journal of Economics,2011
5. “The Rise of Europe: Atlantic Trade, Institutional Change and Economic Growth,”;Acemoglu;American Economic Review,2005
Cited by
208 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献