Author:
Costinot Arnaud,Donaldson Dave,Vogel Jonathan,Werning Iván
Abstract
Abstract
The theory of comparative advantage is at the core of neoclassical trade theory. Yet we know little about its implications for how nations should conduct their trade policy. For example, should import sectors with weaker comparative advantage be protected more? Conversely, should export sectors with stronger comparative advantage be subsidized less? In this article we take a first stab at exploring these issues. Our main results imply that in the context of a canonical Ricardian model, optimal import tariffs should be uniform, whereas optimal export subsidies should be weakly decreasing with respect to comparative advantage, reflecting the fact that countries have more room to manipulate prices in their comparative-advantage sectors. Quantitative exercises suggest substantial gains from such policies relative to simpler tax schedules.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
Economics and Econometrics
Reference42 articles.
1. “General Equilibrium Analysis of the Eaton-Kortum Model of International Trade,”;Alvarez;Journal of Monetary Economics,2007
2. “The Theory of Optimal Delegation with an Application to Tariff Caps,”;Amador;Econometrica,2013
3. “Commitment versus Flexibility,”;Amador;Econometrica,2006
4. “Trade Costs,”;Anderson;Journal of Economic Literature,2004
5. “New Trade Models, Same Old Gains?,”;Arkolakis;American Economic Review,2011
Cited by
66 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献