Meaning and Affect in the Placebo Effect

Author:

Chiffi Daniele1,Pietarinen Ahti-Veikko23,Grecucci Alessandro4

Affiliation:

1. Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy

2. Tallinn University of Technology, Tallinn, Estonia

3. HSE University, Moscow, Russia

4. Università degli Studi di Trento, Rovereto, Italy

Abstract

Abstract This article presents and defends an integrated view of the placebo effect, termed “affective-meaning-making” model, which draws from theoretical reflection, clinical outcomes, and neurophysiological findings. We consider the theoretical limitations of those proposals associated with the “meaning view” on the placebo effect which (a) leave the general aspects of meaning unspecified, (b) fail to analyze fully the role of emotions and affect, and (c) establish no clear connection between the theoretical, physiological, and psychological aspects of the effect. We point out that a promising way to overcome these limitations is given by grounding the placebo effect on Peirce’s theory of meaning, in which the role of the meaning constitution and change is placed in logical and objective structures. We also show the connection between our theoretical proposal and the appraisal theory and integrate it with emotion regulation.

Funder

Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology

Estonian Research Council

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Philosophy,General Medicine,Issues, ethics and legal aspects

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Philosophical Acts of Wonder in Bioethics;The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy: A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine;2024-04-20

2. Placebo effect and nursing;Routledge Handbook of Philosophy and Nursing;2023-08-01

3. Harnessing the placebo effect to enhance emotion regulation effectiveness and choice;Scientific Reports;2023-02-09

4. Who are the placebo responders? A cross-sectional cohort study for psychological determinants;Pain;2021-09-10

5. If You Love the Forest, then Do Not Kill the Trees: Health Care and a Place for the Particular;The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy: A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine;2021-06-01

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3