Principles, Paradigms, and Protections
Affiliation:
1. University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
Abstract
Abstract
The breadth of themes addressed in this issue of the Journal of Medicine and Philosophy is striking. These articles brim with some of the most foundational questions one can ask in bioethics and the philosophy of medicine: Under what circumstances might we risk some harm in pursuit of a greater good? In the setting of experimental therapies, how should we weigh the potential risk and benefit for an individual patient against the broader potential benefit realized for society as a whole? How might we consistently differentiate health from pathology? Under what circumstances might we say that a human being has died? Does acknowledging particular things (such as play) as good generate duties? Duties for whom and enforced by whom? These articles share a preoccupation with foundational questions that must be addressed in any sound bioethics curriculum, and they make clear that our answers to these questions are not simply theoretical but manifest in policy and in practice.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
Philosophy,General Medicine,Issues, ethics and legal aspects
Reference26 articles.
1. A second rebuttal on health;Boorse;The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy,2014
2. Who is entitled to double effect?;Boyle;The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy,1991
3. Factsheet CDC guideline for prescribing opioids for chronic pain;CDC NCIPC Division of Unintentional Injury Prevention,2014
4. Determination of death: A scientific perspective on biological integration;Condic;The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy,2016
5. Toward understanding aspects of the precautionary principle;Cranor;The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy,2004