Infectious Diseases Society of America Guidelines on the Diagnosis of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): Serologic Testing

Author:

Hanson Kimberly E1,Caliendo Angela M2,Arias Cesar A3,Englund Janet A4,Hayden Mary K56,Lee Mark J7,Loeb Mark8,Patel Robin9,Altayar Osama10,El Alayli Abdallah11,Sultan Shahnaz12,Falck-Ytter Yngve13,Lavergne Valéry14,Morgan Rebecca L15,Murad M Hassan16,Bhimraj Adarsh17,Mustafa Reem A18

Affiliation:

1. Divisions of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA

2. Department of Medicine, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA

3. Division of Infectious Diseases, Center for Antimicrobial Resistance and Microbial Genomics, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, McGovern Medical School and Center for Infectious Diseases, School of Public Health, Houston, Texas, USA

4. Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington, Seattle Children’s Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, USA

5. Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA

6. Department of Pathology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA

7. Department of Pathology and Clinical Microbiology Laboratory, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA

8. Division of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

9. Division of Clinical Microbiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA

10. Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri, USA

11. Outcomes and Implementation Research Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA

12. Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis VA Healthcare System, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA

13. VA Northeast Ohio Healthcare System, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio, USA

14. Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

15. Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

16. Division of Preventive Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA

17. Department of Infectious Diseases, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA

18. Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundThe availability of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) serologic testing has rapidly increased. Current assays use a variety of technologies, measure different classes of immunoglobulin or immunoglobulin combinations, and detect antibodies directed against different portions of the virus. The overall accuracy of these tests, however, has not been well defined. The Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) convened an expert panel to perform a systematic review of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) serology literature and construct best-practice guidance related to SARS-CoV-2 serologic testing. This guideline is the fourth in a series of rapid, frequently updated COVID-19 guidelines developed by IDSA.ObjectiveIDSA’s goal was to develop evidence-based recommendations that assist clinicians, clinical laboratories, patients, and policymakers in decisions related to the optimal use of SARS-CoV-2 serologic tests in a variety of settings. We also highlight important unmet research needs pertaining to the use of anti–SARS-CoV-2 antibody tests for diagnosis, public health surveillance, vaccine development, and the selection of convalescent plasma donors.MethodsA multidisciplinary panel of infectious diseases clinicians, clinical microbiologists, and experts in systematic literature review identified and prioritized clinical questions related to the use of SARS-CoV-2 serologic tests. Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology was used to assess the certainty of evidence and make testing recommendations.ResultsThe panel agreed on 8 diagnostic recommendations.ConclusionsInformation on the clinical performance and utility of SARS-CoV-2 serologic tests is rapidly emerging. Based on available evidence, detection of anti–SARS-CoV-2 antibodies may be useful for confirming the presence of current or past infection in selected situations. The panel identified 3 potential indications for serologic testing, including (1) evaluation of patients with a high clinical suspicion for COVID-19 when molecular diagnostic testing is negative and ≥2 weeks have passed since symptom onset, (2) assessment of multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children, and (3) conducting serosurveillance studies. The certainty of available evidence supporting the use of serology for either diagnosis or epidemiology was, however, graded as very low to moderate. For the most updated version of these guidelines, please go to https://www.idsociety.org/covid19guidelines.

Funder

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Infectious Diseases,Microbiology (medical)

Cited by 87 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3