Risk Factors and Outcomes of Hospitalized Patients With Severe Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) and Secondary Bloodstream Infections: A Multicenter Case-Control Study

Author:

Bhatt Pinki J12ORCID,Shiau Stephanie3,Brunetti Luigi2,Xie Yingda4,Solanki Kinjal1,Khalid Shaza4,Mohayya Sana5,Au Pak Ho6,Pham Christopher7,Uprety Priyanka8,Nahass Ronald9,Narayanan Navaneeth12

Affiliation:

1. Division of Allergy/Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA

2. Department of Pharmacy Practice and Administration, Rutgers University Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy, Piscataway, New Jersey, USA

3. Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Rutgers School of Public Health, Piscataway, New Jersey, USA

4. Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey, USA

5. Department of Pharmacy, Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA

6. Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA

7. Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey, USA

8. Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA

9. ID Care, Hillsborough, New Jersey, USA

Abstract

Abstract Background Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has become a global pandemic. Clinical characteristics regarding secondary infections in patients with COVID-19 have been reported, but detailed microbiology, risk factors, and outcomes of secondary bloodstream infections (sBSIs) in patients with severe COVID-19 have not been well described. Methods We performed a multicenter case-control study including all hospitalized patients diagnosed with severe COVID-19 and blood cultures drawn from 1 March 2020 to 7 May 2020 at 3 academic medical centers in New Jersey. Data collection included demographics, clinical and microbiologic variables, and patient outcomes. Risk factors and outcomes were compared between cases (sBSI) and controls (no sBSI). Results A total of 375 hospitalized patients were included. There were 128 sBSIs during the hospitalization. For the first set of positive blood cultures, 117 (91.4%) were bacterial and 7 (5.5%) were fungal. Those with sBSI were more likely to have altered mental status, lower mean percentage oxygen saturation on room air, have septic shock, and be admitted to the intensive care unit compared with controls. In-hospital mortality was higher in those with an sBSI versus controls (53.1% vs 32.8%, P = .0001). Conclusions We observed that hospitalized adult patients with severe COVID-19 and sBSI had a more severe initial presentation, prolonged hospital course, and worse clinical outcomes. To maintain antimicrobial stewardship principles, further prospective studies are necessary to better characterize risk factors and prediction modeling to better understand when to suspect and empirically treat for sBSIs in severe COVID-19.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Infectious Diseases,Microbiology (medical)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3