Improving Decision Making in Empiric Antibiotic Selection (IDEAS) for Gram-negative Bacteremia: A Prospective Clinical Implementation Study

Author:

Elligsen Marion12,Pinto Ruxandra3,Leis Jerome A45,Walker Sandra A N12,Daneman Nick46,MacFadden Derek R7

Affiliation:

1. Department of Pharmacy, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada

2. Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada

3. Department of Critical Care and Population Health, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada

4. Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada

5. Centre of Quality Improvement and Patient Safety, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada

6. Sunnybrook Research Institute, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada

7. Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada

Abstract

Abstract Background Timely selection of adequate empiric antibiotics has become increasingly difficult due to rising resistance rates and the competing desire to apply antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) principles. Individualized clinical prediction models offer the promise of reducing broad-spectrum antibiotic use and preserving/improving adequacy of treatment, but few have been validated in the clinical setting. Methods Multivariable models were used to predict the probability of susceptibility for gram-negative (GN) bacteria in bloodstream infections (bacteremia) to ceftriaxone, ciprofloxacin, ceftazidime, piperacillin-tazobactam, and meropenem. The models were combined with existing resistance-prediction methods to generate optimized and individualized suggestions for empiric therapy that were provided to prescribers by an AMS pharmacist. De-escalation of empiric antibiotics and adequacy of therapy were analyzed using a quasi-experimental design comparing two 9-month periods (pre- and postintervention) at a large academic tertiary care institution. Results Episodes of bacteremia (n = 182) were identified in the preintervention and postintervention (n = 201) periods. Patients who received the intervention were more likely to have their therapy de-escalated (29 vs 21%; aOR = 1.77; 95% CI, 1.09–2.87; P = .02). The intervention also increased the proportion of patients who were on the narrowest adequate therapy at the time of culture finalization (44% in the control and 55% in the intervention group; aOR = 2.04; 95% CI, 1.27–3.27; P = .003). Time to adequate therapy was similar in the intervention and control groups (5 vs 4 hours; P = .95). Conclusions An AMS intervention, based on individualized predictive models for resistance, can influence empiric antibiotic selections for GN bacteremia to facilitate early de-escalation of therapy without compromising adequacy of antibiotic coverage.

Funder

Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Infectious Diseases,Microbiology (medical)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3