Infectious Diseases Society of America Guidelines on the Diagnosis of Coronavirus Disease 2019

Author:

Hanson Kimberly E1,Caliendo Angela M2,Arias Cesar A3,Englund Janet A4,Lee Mark J5,Loeb Mark6,Patel Robin7,El Alayli Abdallah8,Kalot Mohamad A9,Falck-Ytter Yngve10,Lavergne Valery11,Morgan Rebecca L12,Murad M Hassan13,Sultan Shahnaz14,Bhimraj Adarsh15,Mustafa Reem A16

Affiliation:

1. Department of Internal Medicine and Pathology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA

2. Department of Medicine, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA

3. Division of Infectious Diseases, Center for Antimicrobial Resistance and Microbial Genomics, University of Texas Health McGovern Medical School, Center for Infectious Diseases, University of Texas Health School of Public Health, Houston, Texas, USA

4. Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington, Seattle Children’s Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, USA

5. Department of Pathology and Clinical Microbiology Laboratory, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA

6. Division of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

7. Division of Clinical Microbiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA

8. Department of Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA

9. Outcomes and Implementation Research Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA

10. VA Northeast Ohio Healthcare System, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio, USA

11. Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

12. Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

13. Division of Preventive Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA

14. Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis VA Healthcare System, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA

15. Department of Infectious Diseases, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA

16. Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA

Abstract

Abstract IDSA Disclaimer As of the time of this publication, updates have been made to IDSA’s Guidelines on the Diagnosis of COVID-19. For the most updated version of these guidelines, please go to http://www.idsociety.org/covid19guidelines. Background Accurate molecular diagnostic tests are necessary for confirming a diagnosis of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Direct detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) nucleic acids in respiratory tract specimens informs patient, healthcare institution, and public health–level decision-making. The number of available SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid detection tests is rapidly increasing, as is the COVID-19 diagnostic literature. Thus, the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) recognized a significant need for frequently updated systematic reviews of the literature to inform evidence-based best practice guidance. Objective The IDSA’s goal was to develop an evidence-based diagnostic guidelines to assist clinicians, clinical laboratorians, patients, and policy makers in decisions related to the optimal use of SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid amplification tests. In addition, the society provides a conceptual framework for understanding molecular diagnostic test performance, discusses the nuance of test result interpretation in a variety of practice settings, and highlights important unmet research needs in the COVID-19 diagnostic testing arena. Methods IDSA convened a multidisciplinary panel of infectious diseases clinicians, clinical microbiologists, and experts in systematic literature review to identify and prioritize clinical questions and outcomes related to the use of SARS-CoV-2 molecular diagnostics. Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation methodology was used to assess the certainty of evidence and make testing recommendations. Results The panel agreed on 15 diagnostic recommendations. Conclusions Universal access to accurate SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid testing is critical for patient care, hospital infection prevention, and the public response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Information on the clinical performance of available tests is rapidly emerging, but the quality of evidence of the current literature is considered low to very low. Recognizing these limitations, the IDSA panel weighed available diagnostic evidence and recommends nucleic acid testing for all symptomatic individuals suspected of having COVID-19. In addition, testing is recommended for asymptomatic individuals who have had a known or suspected contact with a COVID-19 case. Testing asymptomatic individuals without known exposure is suggested when the results will impact isolation/quarantine/personal protective equipment usage decisions, dictate eligibility for surgery, or inform administration of immunosuppressive therapy. Ultimately, prioritization of testing will depend on institution-specific resources and the needs of different patient populations.

Funder

Infectious Diseases Society of America

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Infectious Diseases,Microbiology (medical)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3