AN EXPERIMENTAL COMPARISON OF SELECTION ALTERNATIVES TO PLATEAUED RESPONSE

Author:

Brown Wm P1,Bell A E1

Affiliation:

1. Purdue University, Lafayette, Indiana 47907

Abstract

ABSTRACT Three alteriiative selection methods for extending selection limits or breaking respome plateaus were compared over ten generations in a replicated model experiment using two unrelated populations of Drosophila melunoguster that no longer responded to purebred selection for high egg number, a heterotic pclygenic trait. The three methods were: (1) reciprocal recurrent selection (RRS) with selection within each of the plateaued populations based solely on crossbred performance, (2)a modification of reciprocal recurrent selection (MRRS) with selection within each population based on both purebred and crossbred performance, and (3)purebred selection within a new synthetic population formed by crossing the two plateaued populations.—Conflicting estimates were obtained for heritability of purebred egg number in each of the plateaued populations. The realized heritability values and estimates from diallel analyses indicated an absence ofadditive genetic variation for both populations; however, estimates from conventional intraclass correlation methods were positive. The diallel analyses revealed significant amounts of nonadditive gene effects for purebred egg number in each population, while the significant gene effects for crossbred egg numbers were additive. Estimates of the genetic correlation between purebred and crossbred egg number were negative (—0.85 ± 0.68 and -0.32 ± 0.25) for the two base populations.—All three alternatives to continued purebred selection gave significant responses, with the average gain pergeneration from MRRS being significantly superior to the other two methods. Observed purebred and crossbred responses under RRS were in agreement with quantitative genetic theory. Such was not the case for MRRS, which suggested the possibility of major gene segregation.—Evidence supparting a negative genetic correlation between purebred and crossbred performance and the possibility of overdominance is presented and discussed.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Genetics

Cited by 8 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3