Affiliation:
1. Department of Political Science, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
Abstract
Abstract
This article challenges the focus on budget deficits that permeates the literature on the comparative political economy of fiscal policy. It analyzes countries running budget surpluses and asks why some preserved these surpluses while others did not. Whereas several OECD members recorded surpluses for just a few years, balanced budgets became the norm in Australia, Canada, Denmark, Finland, New Zealand and Sweden in the late 1990s. The article compares both types of countries. Focusing on Canada and Sweden, it argues that a path-dependent shift in the balance of power among competing fiscal policy coalitions explains why surpluses persisted in one group of countries but not in the other. This reconfiguration of fiscal conflict was triggered by a deep fiscal crisis and an ensuing expenditure-led consolidation. It can be interpreted as creating a ‘surplus regime,’ in which fiscal policy became structured around the goals of balancing the budget and cutting taxes.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
General Economics, Econometrics and Finance,Sociology and Political Science
Reference91 articles.
1. The Political Economy of the Budget Surplus in the United States’,;Alesina;Journal of Economic Perspectives,2000
2. Why are Stabilizations Delayed?’;Alesina;American Economic Review,1991
Cited by
10 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献