Affiliation:
1. Stanford University , USA
2. University of Missouri , USA
3. Korea University , South Korea
Abstract
Abstract
Recent studies on the public opinion mechanism of the democratic peace have demonstrated experimentally that democratic citizens are averse to attacking other democracies. The presence of rivalry, however, has long been recognized as one of the important factors contributing to either initiation or recurrence of international conflict. Despite such importance, our understanding remains limited as to how rivalry affects public opinion, particularly in the context of the democratic peace. In this article, we argue that democratic publics’ perception of rivalry weakens the effect of regime type. We expect democratic publics to be less reluctant in terms of fighting other rival democracies. Using an original survey experiment in South Korea, we demonstrate that the South Korean public, similar to those of western democracies, is reluctant to use force against nonrival democracies, but less so against rival democracies. Our findings suggest that the scope of the democratic peace should be qualified.
Funder
Ministry of Education of the Republic of Korea
National Research Foundation of Korea
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Reference44 articles.
1. Authoritarian Public Opinion and the Democratic Peace;Bell;International Organization,2018
2. Absraction and Detail in Experimental Design;Brutger;American Journal of Political Science,2022
3. Abstraction in Experimental Design
4. Hot Spots or Hot Hands? Serial Crisis Behavior, Escalating Risks, and Rivalry;Colaresi;Journal of Politics,2002