How Expert Committees Become Group Agents: Self-Legitimation in the Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities

Author:

Heupel Monika1ORCID,Joger Marlene1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. University of Bamberg , Germany

Abstract

Abstract The UN human rights treaty bodies—groups of experts tasked with monitoring how states implement international human rights conventions—are increasingly portrayed as powerful collective entities with agency. This article focuses on one mechanism that helps collectives of individuals become group agents, namely internal self-legitimation. By internal self-legitimation, we mean practices such as narratives and rituals enacted by a group that ascribe legitimacy to it in the eyes of its members and are key to building common identification among them. We explore how self-legitimation facilitates group agency on the basis of a case study on the Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD), obtaining empirical evidence for the study from content analysis of CRPD documents and interviews with former and present members. We show that specific legitimation narratives—related to the moral value of the committee’s task and the moral integrity of its members, the fairness of the CRPD’s procedures, and the committee’s association with other presumably legitimate institutions—facilitated identity-building and helped the CRPD to develop the characteristics of a group agent and take decisions. Finally, we explore the conditions on which the findings might be applicable to other human rights treaty bodies.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Reference84 articles.

1. International Practices;Adler;International Theory,2011

2. Dangerous Tales: Dominant Narratives on the Congo and Their Unintended Consequences;Autesserre;African Affairs,2012

3. "Groups." In;Bacharach,2006

4. Old Wine in New Bottles? The Legitimation and Delegitimation of UN Public-Private Partnerships for Sustainable Development from the Johannesburg Summit to the Rio+20 Summit;Bäckstrand;Globalizations,2014

5. Legitimation and Delegitimation in Global Governance: Discursive, Institutional, and Behavioral practices;Bäckstrand,2018

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3