Affiliation:
1. University of Toronto , Canada
2. University of Oxford , UK
3. DeepMind , UK
Abstract
Abstract
The internal institutional structures of states greatly impact their citizens’ welfare. However, states are not at complete liberty to adopt any internal form. Competitive pressure arising from anarchy limits the range of viable domestic institutions to those that do not impose a significant disadvantage. We argue that technological change can alter the relative competitiveness of different state forms and, by extension, improve or degrade human welfare. We empirically support this argument through a macrohistorical survey of competitively significant technologies. We conclude that the true costs of international anarchy are greater than commonly appreciated, as competitive pressure may force states to evolve into forms detrimental to the welfare of their inhabitants. Moreover, the adoption of state forms that improve human well-being is often driven by technological change as much as human agency. Finally, the invention of seemingly beneficial technologies may decrease human well-being by improving the competitiveness of inegalitarian state forms.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Reference82 articles.
1. Health as a Crucial Factor in the Changes from Hunting to Developed Farming in the Eastern Mediterranean;Angel,1984
2. The Origins of Agriculture: Population Growth during a Period of Declining Health;Armelagos;Population and Environment,1991