Which Words Matter Most? Operationalizing Lexical Prevalence For Rank-Ordered Word Lists

Author:

Egbert Jesse1,Burch Brent2

Affiliation:

1. Northern Arizona University, English Department, Northern Arizona University , Flagstaff, AZ 86011-5717 , USA

2. Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Northern Arizona University , Flagstaff, AZ 86011-5717 , USA

Abstract

Abstract The words in a language or language variety are often rank ordered in lists that are meant to reflect the relative importance of those words to language users and learners of a language. This rank ordering is done on the basis of the relative prevalence of words in a corpus. Lexical prevalence is often operationalized as measures of frequency, dispersion, or adjusted frequency. Yet, to date, there is no consensus on best practices for identifying and ranking prevalent words in a corpus, or for evaluating the degree to which a word’s importance is reflected through its prevalence. We begin this paper by introducing and describing a wide range of corpus-based measures for quantifying lexical prevalence. We then carry out two case studies on the Duolingo University Textbook Corpus to evaluate the methods for their ability to identify and appropriately rank words in terms of their importance. We conclude with recommendations for word list creators and researchers and practitioners interested in word importance.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics,Communication

Reference34 articles.

1. ‘On the (non) utility of Juilland’s D to measure lexical dispersion in large corpora,’;Biber;International Journal of Corpus Linguistics,2016

2. ‘Is there a core general vocabulary? Introducing the new general service list,’;Brezina;Applied Linguistics,2015

3. ‘A new general service list: The better mousetrap we’ve been looking for,’;Browne;Vocabulary Learning and Instruction,2014

4. ‘The new general service list: A core vocabulary for EFL students and teachers,’;Browne;JALTs The Language Teacher,2013

5. ‘Moving beyond Kučera and Francis: A critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English,’;Brysbaert;Behavior Research Methods,2009

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3