An Experimental Evaluation of an Online Interview Scheduler: Effects on Fieldwork Outcomes

Author:

McGonagle Katherine1,Sastry Narayan2

Affiliation:

1. Research Professor at the Institute for Social Research, Survey Research Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA

2. Research Professor at the Institute for Social Research, Survey Research Center and Population Studies Center, at the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA

Abstract

Abstract In recent years, household surveys have expended significant effort to counter well-documented increases in direct refusals and greater difficulty contacting survey respondents. A substantial amount of fieldwork effort in panel surveys using telephone interviewing is devoted to the task of contacting the respondent to schedule the day and time of the interview. Higher fieldwork effort leads to greater costs and is associated with lower response rates. A new approach was experimentally evaluated in the 2017 wave of the Panel Study of Income Dynamics (PSID) Transition into Adulthood Supplement (TAS) that allowed a randomly selected subset of respondents to choose their own day and time of their telephone interview through the use of an online appointment scheduler. TAS is a nationally representative study of US young adults aged 18–28 years embedded within the worlds’ longest running panel study, the PSID. This paper experimentally evaluates the effect of offering the online appointment scheduler on fieldwork outcomes, including number of interviewer contact attempts and interview sessions, number of days to complete the interview, and response rates. We describe panel study members’ characteristics associated with uptake of the online scheduler and examine differences in the effectiveness of the treatment across subgroups. Finally, potential cost-savings of fieldwork effort due to the online appointment scheduler are evaluated.

Funder

National Institute of Child Health and Human Development

National Science Foundation

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Applied Mathematics,Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty,Social Sciences (miscellaneous),Statistics and Probability

Reference28 articles.

1. “Likelihood of a Model and Information Criteria,”;Akaike;Journal of Econometrics,1981

2. Response Rates in the European Social Survey: Increasing, Decreasing, or a Matter of Fieldwork Efforts?;Beullens;Survey Methods: Insights from the Field,2018

3. Multimodel Inference: Understanding AIC and BIC in Model Selection;Burnham;Sociological Methods & Research,2004

4. The Long-Term Effectiveness of Refusal Conversion Procedures on Longitudinal Surveys;Burton;Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society),2006

5. Who’s Calling? The Impact of Caller ID on Telephone Survey Response;Callegaro;Field Methods,2010

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3