Should We Offer Web, Paper, or Both? A Comparison of Single- and Mixed-Response Mode Treatments in a Mail Survey

Author:

Heimel Sarah K1,Medway Rebecca L2,Horwitz Rachel T3

Affiliation:

1. Mathematical Statistician in the U.S. Census Bureau Sarah K. Heimel is a , Suitland, MD 20746, USA

2. Principal Survey Methodologist in the American Institutes for Research Rebecca L. Medway is a , Arlington, VA 22202, USA

3. Lead Scientist for Survey Design and Improvement in the U.S. Census Bureau Rachel T. Horwitz is a , Suitland, MD 20746, USA

Abstract

Abstract This article leverages a five-treatment response mode experiment (paper-only, web-only, sequential web-mail, choice, and choice-plus [choice with a promised incentive for responding online]) that was conducted within a nationally representative survey. Because this survey’s sample was drawn from respondents to another nationally representative survey, we have rich frame data that includes multiple indicators of comfort using the internet for our sample members and we can compare their response behavior across two surveys. We find that the paper-only treatment yielded a lower response rate than most of the other treatments, but there were not significant differences between the response rates for the other treatments. Among our mixed-mode treatments, the sequential web-mail treatment had the highest percentage of response by web and the lowest cost per response. When focusing on the subgroups that we expected to be the least—and the most—comfortable with the internet, we found that the paper-only treatment generally performed worse than the others, even among subgroups expected not to be comfortable with the internet. We generally did not find significant differences in the effect of response mode treatment on the response rate or percentage of response by web between the subgroups who were the most and least comfortable with the internet. In terms of the consistency of response mode choice over time, our results suggest that some people respond consistently—but also that response mode preferences are weak enough that they can be influenced by the way in which the modes are offered. We ultimately recommend using a sequential web-mail design to minimize costs while still providing people who cannot or will not respond by web with another response mode option. We also find evidence that there may be a growing lack of interest in responding by paper; more research is needed in this area.

Funder

National Science Foundation

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Census Bureau

American Institutes for Research

National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics

National Center for Education Statistics

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Reference52 articles.

1. The Stability of Mode Preferences: Implications for Tailoring in Longitudinal Surveys;Al Baghal;Methods, Data, Analyses: A Journal for Quantitative Methods and Survey Methodology,2016

2. Using Bonus Monetary Incentives to Encourage Web Response in Mixed-Mode Household Surveys;Biemer;Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology,2018

3. How Do Internet-Related Characteristics Affect Whether Members of a German Mixed-Mode Panel Switch from the Mail to the Web Mode?;Bretschi;Social Science Computer Review,2022

4. A Mixed-Mode and Incentive Experiment Using Administrative Data;Bucks;Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology,2020

5. Is There an Association between Survey Characteristics and Representativeness? A Meta-Analysis;Cornesse;Survey Research Methods,2018

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Recent Innovations and Advances in Mixed-Mode Surveys;Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology;2024-06-01

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3