Peekaboo! The Effect of Different Visible Cash Display and Amount Options During Mail Contact When Recruiting to a Probability-Based Panel

Author:

Bilgen Ipek1ORCID,Dutwin David2ORCID,Singh Roopam3,Hendarwan Erlina4

Affiliation:

1. University of Chicago Principal Research Methodologist with the NORC at the , 55 East Monroe Street, 31st Floor, Chicago, IL 60603, USA

2. University of Chicago Senior Vice President with the NORC at the , 55 East Monroe Street, 31st Floor, Chicago, IL 60603, USA

3. University of Chicago Panel Operations Manager with the NORC at the , 55 East Monroe Street, 31st Floor, Chicago, IL 60603, USA

4. University of Chicago Panel Operations Director with the NORC at the , 55 East Monroe Street, 31st Floor, Chicago, IL 60603, USA

Abstract

Abstract Recent studies consistently showed that making cash visible with a windowed envelope during mail contact increases response rates in surveys. The visible cash aims to pique interest and encourage sampled households to open the envelope. This article extends prior research by examining the effect of additional interventions implemented during mail recruitment to a survey panel on recruitment rates and costs. Specifically, we implemented randomized experiments to examine size (small, large) and location (none, front, back) of the window displaying cash, combined with what part of the cash is shown through the window envelope (numeric amount, face/image), and various prepaid incentive amounts (two $1, one $2, one $5). We used the recruitment effort for NORC’s AmeriSpeak Panel as the data source for this study. The probability-based AmeriSpeak Panel uses an address-based sample and multiple modes of respondent contact, including mail, phone, and in-person outreach during recruitment. Our results were consistent with prior research and showed significant improvement in recruitment rates when cash was displayed through a window during mail contact. We also found that placing the window on the front of the envelope, showing $5 through the envelope compared to $2 and $1, and showing the tender amount compared to the image on the cash through the window were more likely to improve the recruitment rates. Our cost analyses illustrated that the cost difference in printing window versus no window envelope is small. There is no difference in printing cost between front window and back window as they both require custom manufacturing. There is also no cost difference in printing envelopes with small windows versus large windows. Lastly, we found no evidence of mail theft based on our review of the United States Postal Service’s “track and trace” reports, seed mailings sent to staff, and undeliverable mailing rates.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Applied Mathematics,Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty,Social Sciences (miscellaneous),Statistics and Probability

Reference22 articles.

1. Getting Past the Trash Bin: Attribution about Envelope Message, Envelope Characteristics, and Intention to Open Direct Mail;Amos;Journal of Marketing Communications,2009

2. To Mix or Not to Mix Data Collection Modes in Surveys;De Leeuw;Journal of Official Statistics,2005

3. Mixed-Mode: Past, Present, and Future;De Leeuw;Survey Research Methods,2018

4. The Visible Cash Effect with Prepaid Incentives: Evidence for Data Quality, Response Rates, Generalizability, and Cost;DeBell;Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology,2022

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3