A Description of the Statistical Methods for the Vaccine Impact on Diarrhea in Africa (VIDA) Study

Author:

Powell Helen12,Liang Yuanyuan13,Neuzil Kathleen M14,Jamka Leslie P14,Nasrin Dilruba14,Sow Samba O5,Hossain M Jahangir6,Omore Richard7,Kotloff Karen L12

Affiliation:

1. Center for Vaccine Development and Global Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine , Baltimore, Maryland , USA

2. Department of Pediatrics, University of Maryland School of Medicine , Baltimore, Maryland , USA

3. Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine , Baltimore, Maryland , USA

4. Department of Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine , Baltimore, Maryland , USA

5. Centre pour le Développement des Vaccins du Mali (CVD-Mali) , Bamako , Mali

6. Medical Research Council Unit, The Gambia at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine , Banjul , The Gambia

7. Kenya Medical Research Institute, Center for Global Health Research (KEMRI-CGHR) , Kisumu , Kenya

Abstract

Abstract Background Diarrheal diseases remain a health threat to children in low- and middle-income countries. The Vaccine Impact on Diarrhea in Africa (VIDA) study was a 36-month, prospective, matched case-control study designed to estimate the etiology, incidence, and adverse clinical consequences of moderate-to-severe diarrhea (MSD) in children aged 0–59 months. VIDA was conducted following rotavirus vaccine introduction at 3 censused sites in sub-Saharan Africa that participated in the Global Enteric Multicenter Study (GEMS) ∼10 years earlier. We describe the study design and statistical methods of VIDA and where they differ from GEMS. Methods We aimed to enroll 8–9 MSD cases every 2 weeks from sentinel health centers in 3 age strata (0–11, 12–23, 24–59 months) and 1 to 3 controls matched by age, sex, date of case enrollment, and village. Clinical, epidemiological, and anthropometric data were collected at enrollment and ∼60 days later. A stool specimen collected at enrollment was analyzed by both conventional methods and quantitative PCR for enteric pathogens. For the matched case-control study, we estimated the population-based, pathogen-specific attributable fraction (AF) and attributable incidence adjusted for age, site, and other pathogens, and identified episodes attributable to a specific pathogen for additional analyses. A prospective cohort study nested within the original matched case-control study allowed assessment of (1) the association between potential risk factors and outcomes other than MSD status and (2) the impact of MSD on linear growth. Conclusions GEMS and VIDA together comprise the largest and most comprehensive assessment of MSD conducted to date in sub-Saharan Africa populations at highest risk for morbidity and mortality from diarrhea. The statistical methods used in VIDA have endeavored to maximize the use of available data to produce more robust estimates of the pathogen-specific disease burden that might be prevented by effective interventions.

Funder

Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Infectious Diseases,Microbiology (medical)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3