Revisiting the Evidence Base for Modern-Day Practice of the Treatment of Toxoplasmic Encephalitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Author:

Prosty Connor1ORCID,Hanula Ryan2,Levin Yossef1,Bogoch Isaac I3,McDonald Emily G245,Lee Todd C256

Affiliation:

1. Faculty of Medicine, McGill University , Montréal, Québec , Canada

2. Division of Experimental Medicine, Department of Medicine, McGill University , Montréal, Québec , Canada

3. Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto , Toronto, Ontario , Canada

4. Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, McGill University Health Centre , Montréal, Québec , Canada

5. Clinical Practice Assessment Unit, Department of Medicine, McGill University Health Centre , Montréal, Québec , Canada

6. Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, McGill University Health Centre , Québec, Montréal , Canada

Abstract

Abstract Background Toxoplasmic encephalitis (TE) is an opportunistic infection of people with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) or other causes of immunosuppression. Guideline-recommended treatments for TE are pyrimethamine and sulfadiazine (P-S) or pyrimethamine and clindamycin (P-C); however, a substantial price increase has limited access to pyrimethamine. Consequently, some centers have transitioned to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX), an inexpensive alternative treatment. We aimed to review the evidence on the efficacy and safety of pyrimethamine-containing therapies vs TMP-SMX. Methods We searched for and included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies of TE treatments, regardless of HIV status. Data for each therapy were pooled by meta-analysis to assess the proportions of patients who experienced clinical and radiologic responses to treatment, all-cause mortality, and discontinuation due to toxicity. Sensitivity analyses limited to RCTs directly compared therapies. Results We identified 6 RCTs/dose-escalation studies and 26 single-arm/observational studies. Identified studies included only persons with HIV, and most predated modern antiretroviral treatment. Pooled proportions of clinical and radiologic response and mortality were not significantly different between TMP-SMX and pyrimethamine-containing regimens (P > .05). Treatment discontinuation due to toxicity was significantly lower in TMP-SMX (7.3%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.7–11.4; I2 = 0.0%) vs P-S (30.5%; 95% CI, 27.1–34.2; I2 = 0.0%; P < .01) or P-C (13.7%; 95% CI, 9.8–18.8; I2 = 32.0%; P = .031). These results were consistent in analyses restricted to RCT data. Conclusions TMP-SMX appears to be as effective and safer than pyrimethamine-containing regimens for TE. These findings support modern RCTs comparing TMP-SMX to pyrimethamine-based therapies and a revisiting of the guidelines.

Funder

Fonds de Recherche du Québec–Santé

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Infectious Diseases,Microbiology (medical)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3