Abstract
Abstract
Transparency of the lobbying process is hailed as an effective means to limit the influence of special interest groups, but should transparency also apply to the information obtained by policy makers (PMs)? This article extends theories of informational lobbying by explicitly modeling the choice of PMs to obtain information before interacting with lobbyists. This approach reveals a new channel for the value of confidentiality: extracting evidence from special interest groups. It shows that, counter-intuitively, the influence of special interest groups can increase as PMs become more expert. These results shed light on the relationship between confidentiality, good governance, and influence.
Funder
Economic and Social Research Council
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
Law,Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Economics and Econometrics
Reference53 articles.
1. “On the Value of Persuasion by Experts;Alonso;Journal of Economic Theory,2018
2. “Bias and Negligence with Freedom of Information;Argenziano;The Economic Journal,2019
3. “Information and Influence: Lobbying for Agendas and Votes;Austen-Smith;American Journal of Political Science,1993
4. Allocating Access for Information and Contributions,”;Austen-Smith;The Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization,1998
5. “Competitive Lobbying for a Legislator’s Vote,;Austen-Smith;Social Choice and Welfare,1992
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Formal Theories of Special Interest Influence;Annual Review of Political Science;2024-07-29
2. Delegation to incentivize information production;Mathematical Social Sciences;2024-05
3. Legislative informational lobbying;Journal of Economic Theory;2023-03
4. Friendly Lobbying under Time Pressure;American Journal of Political Science;2022-12-16