Affiliation:
1. Department of Political Science, University at Buffalo, SUNY, Buffalo, NY , USA
2. University of Iowa College of Law, Iowa City, IA , USA
Abstract
Abstract
While most social sciences confronted data sharing, transparency, and reproducibility sometime in the last two decades, the legal academy has largely been absent from these discussions. In this study, we examine the degree to which the information underlying empirical studies is available. Using an original dataset of every empirical study published in top law journals from 2010 to 2022, we find that 15% have a dataset that is readily available. We compare these low rates with a dataset of every empirical article published in the top economics, political science, and interdisciplinary journals from 2018 to 2022. The vast majority of these articles (99%) make their data available. Additional analysis demonstrates that disciplinary norms enforced by journals drive when authors make their data available. Given the discrepancy between law and other social sciences, we advocate for a disciplinary and cultural shift in law that embraces data accessibility and identify concrete steps to improve data availability. (JEL K00, K1, K10)
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Reference96 articles.
1. “September Symposium on Verification/Replication,”;Aberbach;PS: Political Science and Politics,1995
2. “A Proposed Standard for the Scholarly Citation of Quantitative Data,”;Altman;D-Lib Magazine,2007
3. “Four Decades of the Journal of Econometrics: Coauthorship Patterns and Networks,”;Andrikopoulos;Journal of Econometrics,2016
4. “Racial Discrimination and the Death Penalty in the Post-Furman Era: An Empirical and Legal Overview, with Recent Findings from Philadelphia,”;Baldus;Cornell Law Review,1998