Abstract
Abstract
Previous literature has explored the effects of economic conditions on voting behavior. In this article, I analyze how the economy affects legislative polarization. Using recently available state legislator ideal point estimates, I find a strong negative relationship between state economic activity and political polarization. States that fared worse economically have experienced greater increases in legislative polarization. I show this relationship is causal by employing an instrumental variables strategy. The instrument isolates exogenous variation in state economic activity by exploiting time-series variation in oil prices, which differentially affects individual states according to their economic dependence on oil production. The estimated polarization effects are stronger for Republicans. The findings have implications for understanding the interaction between the economy and political outcomes. (JEL H7, H83).
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
Law,Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Economics and Econometrics
Reference44 articles.
1. “Income and Health Spending: Evidence from Oil Price Shocks,”;Acemoglu;Review of Economics and Statistics,2013
2. “Importing Political Polarization? The Electoral Consequences of Rising Trade Exposure,”;Autor;American Economic Review,2020
3. “Ideological Donors, Contributor Limits, and the Polarization of American Legislatures,”;Barber;Journal of Politics,2016
4. “Voter Response to Congressional Campaigns: New Techniques for Analyzing Aggregate Electoral Behavior,”;Basinger;Public Choice,2012
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. The Political Economy of Populism;Journal of Economic Literature;2022-09-01