Auctioning Class Action Representation

Author:

Klement Alon1,Neeman Zvika2,Ofir Moran3

Affiliation:

1. Buchmann Faculty of Law, Tel-Aviv University, Israel

2. Berglas School of Economics, Tel-Aviv University, Israel

3. Harry Radzyner Law School, The Interdisciplinary Center (IDC) Herzliya, Israel

Abstract

Abstract Class actions feature severe agency problems, resulting from the divergence of interests between class members and the class attorney. This article proposes a novel mechanism for selecting the class attorney and aligning her interests with those of the represented class. The mechanism applies a combined percentage and hourly litigation fee structure, suggested by Polinsky, Mitchell A., and Daniel L. Rubinfeld. 2003. “Aligning the Interests of Lawyers and Clients,” 5 Am Law Econ Rev 165, in which lawyers earn a percentage of the class’ common fund, and bear the same percentage over their time investment. To maximize the expected payoff for the class, we supplement this fee structure with a preliminary two stages auction, in which the role of the lawyer is tendered using competitive bidding. We prove that the proposed auction approximates the highest possible net payoff for the class as the number of lawyers who compete for the right to represent the class increases. The percentage taken by the lawyer would be the lowest possible, and the winning lawyer would be the one who produces the highest expected net payoff for the class. We then extend the model to cases where the attorney files the class action is compensated for her pre-filing investment, and to settlements (JEL K41, K22)

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Law,Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Economics and Econometrics

Reference48 articles.

1. Contingent Fees and Class Actions;Alexander;DePaul L Rev,1998

2. An Empirical Investigation of Third Party Consumer Litigation Funding;Avraham;Cornell L Rev,2019

3. Third-Party Litigation Funding in Australia and Europe;Barker;J L Econ Policy,2012

4. The Questionable Casefor Using Auctions;Bebchuk;Wash U L Q,2002

5. Toeholds and Takeovers;Bulow;J Political Econ,1999

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3