Cash versus lottery video messages: online COVID-19 vaccine incentives experiment

Author:

Duch Raymond M1ORCID,Barnett Adrian2,Filipek Maciej3,Espinosa-Brito Javier45,Roope Laurence S J6,Violato Mara6,Clarke Philip M6ORCID

Affiliation:

1. University of Oxford Nuffield College, , New Road, Oxford, OX1 1NF, UK

2. Queensland University of Technology , 2 George St, Brisbane City QLD 4000, Australia

3. Vienna University of Economics and Business , Welthandelspl. 1, 1020 Wien, Austria

4. University of Santiago of Chile (USACH) Economics Department, , Avenida Libertador Bernardo O'Higgins nº 3363, Estación Central, Santiago, Chile

5. USACH Santiago Centre for Experimental Social Sciences , Avenida Libertador Bernardo O'Higgins nº 3363, Estación Central, Santiago, Chile

6. University of Oxford Health Economics Research Centre, , Richard Doll Building, Old Road Campus, Headington, Oxford OX3 7LF, UK

Abstract

Abstract During the COVID-19 pandemic, governments offered financial incentives to increase vaccine uptake. We evaluate the impact on COVID-19 vaccine uptake of cash equivalents versus being entered into lotteries. We randomly assign 1628 unvaccinated US participants into one of three 45-second informational videos promoting vaccination with messages about (a) health benefits of COVID-19 vaccines (control), (b) being entered into lotteries or (c) receiving cash equivalent vouchers. After seeing the control health information video, 16% of individuals wanted information on COVID-19 vaccination. This compared with 14% of those assigned to the lottery video (odds ratio of 0.82 relative to control: 95% credible interval, 0.58–1.17) and 22% of those assigned to the cash voucher video (odds ratio of 1.53 relative to control: 95% credible interval, 1.11–2.11). These results support greater use of cash vouchers to promote information seeking about COVID-19 vaccination and do not support the use of lottery incentives.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3