Implementing a Participatory Human Rights-Based Research Methodology: The Unfitness to Plead Project

Author:

Arstein-Kerslake Anna1ORCID,Gooding Piers2,Mercer Sarah3,Raymond Marlena4,McSherry Bernadette5

Affiliation:

1. senior lecturer at Melbourne Law School at the University of Melbourne, Australia

2. research fellow at the Melbourne Social Equity Institute and Melbourne Law School

3. lawyer at Victoria Legal Aid

4. judge’s associate at the Federal Circuit Court of Australia

5. Foundation Director of the Melbourne Social Equity Institute at the University of Melbourne, an adjunct professor in the Melbourne Law School and a Commissioner of the Victorian Law Reform Commission

Abstract

Abstract This article describes a novel action-research methodology that combines aspects of participatory methods and emancipatory principles into a human rights-based framework. The history of these different methods is discussed and the authors then explain how the methods can be combined to create a participatory human rights-based research methodology. This new methodology has the potential for high social impact, community inclusion, and scholarly output. The article also describes the implementation of the methodology on a project which analysed the human rights compliance of unfitness to plead laws in the Australian criminal justice system. This project developed a system of support persons within community legal centres across Australia in order to build an evidence-base for good practice in supporting people with cognitive disability who are charged with a crime. The new participatory human rights-based methodology was successful on this project and is replicable in future human rights research.

Funder

National Disability Research and Development

New South Wales Family and Community Services Research and Data Working Group

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Law,Political Science and International Relations,Sociology and Political Science,History

Reference57 articles.

1. Kurt Lewin and the Origins of Action Research;Adelman;Educational Action Research,1993

2. A Ladder of Citizen Participation;Arnstein;Journal of the American Institute of Planners,1969

3. An Empowering Dependency: Exploring Support for the Exercise of Legal Capacity;Arstein-Kerslake;Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research,2016

4. Human Rights and Unfitness to Plead: The Demands of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities;Arstein-Kerslake;Human Rights Law Review,2017

Cited by 6 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Declaration of the Town Square: The Urgency of Speaking as One;Journal of Human Rights Practice;2024-02-01

2. Factors Influencing the Implementation of Evidence-Based Interventions with Street-Connected Children and Youth: Two Case Studies from Eldoret, Kenya;Global Implementation Research and Applications;2023-05-10

3. Methodological fundamentals of human rights research;Visnik Nacional’nogo universitetu «Lvivska politehnika». Seria: Uridicni nauki;2023-03-22

4. Supported Decision-Making in Criminal Proceedings: A Sociolegal Empirical Study;Journal of Disability Policy Studies;2021-07-04

5. OUP accepted manuscript;Journal of Human Rights Practice;2021

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3