The State of the International Human Rights System—Normativity and Compliance: Introduction

Author:

Kleinlein Thomas1ORCID,Steiger Dominik2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Public International Law, EU Law and Comparative Law, Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena holds the Chair of Public Law, , Carl-Zeiß-Straße 3, 07743 Jena, Germany

2. Chair of Public International Law, European Law and Public Law, Technische Universität Dresden holds the , Bergstraße 53, 01069 Dresden, Germany

Abstract

AbstractThis introduction presents a special issue of the Journal of Human Rights Practice on the state of the international human rights system. It places the challenges and shortcomings of the 2020 Human Rights Treaty Body Review in the context of the broader discussion on human rights normativity and compliance. The unwillingness of member states to fulfil their budgetary commitments, as well as the ignorance with which some reform proposals were met, reflect a lack of understanding of the significance of legal procedures in the human rights treaty bodies. The main focus of reform efforts is to facilitate reporting obligations for states parties by simplifying procedures to make them more manageable for both states parties and treaty bodies. However, lack of compliance with human rights constitutes the severest shortcoming of international human rights protection today. Therefore, current reform ambitions risk losing sight of the rights holders and of actual human rights implementation on the ground. This fear explains the focus of this special issue on the normativity of human rights and compliance: treaty bodies play a continuous and crucial role for the normative force of human rights as well as their continuous development. They should be perceived as agents of social change and tools to turn rhetoric to action. At the same time, the normative meaning of human rights commitments and its (re-)construction depend on social practices in the states parties. After explaining the dialogical approach and framework of the special issue, the introduction provides an overview of individual contributions (articles and comments) and highlights the key messages of the human rights practitioners involved in the special issue against the background of the ongoing treaty body review.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Law,Political Science and International Relations,Sociology and Political Science,History

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3