Affiliation:
1. University of Antwerp, Belgium
Abstract
Abstract
This article analyzes the ways in which the Belgian and Dutch governments legitimize the deportation of unaccompanied minors, by focusing on the interplay of intersectional boundary work and bordering practices. Building on the work of postcolonial feminists and scholars studying the role of identity and cultural values in migration policy, the article highlights that deportation relies on and reifies gendered, racialized, and classed representations of the family, child-rearing practices, and the roles attributed to children. A paternalistic attitude that spurs the moral necessity to protect children mediates the exclusionary potential of such boundaries for deporting states.
Funder
Flanders Research Foundation
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
Social Sciences (miscellaneous),Gender Studies
Reference47 articles.
1. The limits of the liberal state: Migration, identity and belonging in Europe;Adamson;Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies,2011
2. Best interests, durable solutions and belonging: Policy discourses shaping the futures of unaccompanied migrant and refugee minors coming of age in Europe;Allsopp;Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies,2019
3. Regimes of intersection: Facing the manifold interplays of discourses, institutions, and inequalities in the regulation of migration;Amelina;Migration Letters,2020
4. Citizenship, deportation and the boundaries of belonging;Anderson;Citizenship Studies 15,2011
5. Migration, mobility and the dynamics of kinship: New barriers, new assemblages;Andrikopoulos;Ethnography,2020
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献