Affiliation:
1. Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital , Seoul 03080, Republic of Korea
2. Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine , Seoul 03080, Republic of Korea
Abstract
Abstract
Objective
To investigate the predictive value of thoracic sympathetic ganglion block (TSGB) in response to ketamine infusion therapy (KIT) and spinal-cord stimulation (SCS) in patients with chronic upper-extremity pain including complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS).
Design
Retrospective
Setting
Tertiary hospital single-center
Subjects
Patients who underwent TSGB receiving KIT or SCS within a 3-year window.
Methods
Positive TSGB outcomes were defined as ≥2 0–10 Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) score reduction at 2 weeks post-procedure. Positive KIT and SCS outcomes were determined by ≥2 NRS score reduction at 2–4 weeks post-KIT and ≥4 NRS score reduction at 2–4 weeks post-SCS implantation, respectively.
Results
Among 207 patients who underwent TSGB, 38 received KIT and 34 underwent SCS implantation within 3 years post-TSGB; 33 patients receiving KIT and 32 patients receiving SCS were included. Among 33 patients who received KIT, 60.6% (n = 20) reported a ≥ 2 0–10 NRS pain-score reduction. Positive response to TSGB occurred in 70.0% (n = 14) KIT responders, significantly higher than that in 30.8% (n = 4) KIT non-responders. Multivariable analysis revealed a positive association between positive responses to TSGB and KIT (OR 7.004, 95% CI 1.26–39.02). Among 32 patients who underwent SCS implantation, 68.8% (n = 22) experienced short-term effectiveness. Positive response to TSGB was significantly higher in SCS responders (45.5%, n = 10) than in non-responders (0.0%). However, there were no associations between pain reduction post-TSGB and that post-KIT or post-SCS.
Conclusions
A positive response to TSGB is a potential predictor for positive KIT and SCS outcomes among patients with chronic upper-extremity pain, including CRPS.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)