Can ultrasound-guided medial branch blocks be used to select patients for cervical facet joint radiofrequency neurotomy? A matched retrospective cohort validation study

Author:

Burnham Robert123ORCID,Trow Rory4,Trow James5,Smith Ashley26,Burnham Taylor27ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Central Alberta Pain and Rehabilitation Institute , Lacombe, Alberta T4L 2G5, Canada

2. Vivo Cura Health , Calgary, Alberta T2E 2P5, Canada

3. Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Alberta , Edmonton, Alberta T5G 0B7, Canada

4. Salmon Arm Pain Clinic , Salmon Arm, British Columbia V1E 3L4, Canada

5. Department of Medicine, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland University , Dublin D02 YN77, Ireland

6. Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary , Alberta T2N 4N1, Canada

7. Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Utah , Salt Lake City, UT 84132, United States

Abstract

Abstract Background Medial branch blocks are used to select patients for cervical facet joint radiofrequency neurotomy (CRFN). Blocks are typically performed under fluoroscopic guidance (ie, fluoroscopy-guided blocks [FLBs]). The validity of ultrasound-guided blocks (USBs) is not well established. No prior research has compared cervical USB validity and FLB validity with CRFN outcome used as the criterion standard. Objective To evaluate cervical USB versus FLB validity with CRFN outcome used as the criterion standard. Methods Demographic and outcome data were extracted from the electronic medical records of 2 affiliated musculoskeletal pain management clinics for all patients between 2015 and 2023 inclusive who had cervical USB leading to CRFN. CRFN outcomes of each USB patient were compared with those of a matched FLB patient from the radiofrequency neurotomy (RFN) outcome database of the same clinics. Matching variables included patient age, sex, pain duration, diagnostic/prognostic block paradigm, and CRFN number. Each patient completed a numeric rating scale (NRS) pain score and Pain Disability Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (PDQQ) just before and 3 months after CRFN. At repeat CRFN, patients provided a retrospective estimate of the duration and average magnitude (percentage) of relief after the CRFN. Results USB and FLB groups were comprised of 27 patients (58 RFNs) and 38 patients (58 RFNs), respectively. Post-RFN NRS pain severity and PDQQ-Spine scores demonstrated comparable (P > .05) absolute improvements, proportion of patients achieving ≥50% improvement, and attainment of the minimum clinically important difference. Retrospective estimates of pain relief magnitude and duration were also comparable. Conclusions This study finds cervical USB and FLB to be comparably valid as defined by their ability to predict CRFN outcome. Within the limitations of operator competence, USB can be used to select patients for CRFN.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Reference17 articles.

1. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effectiveness of radiofrequency neurotomy in managing chronic neck pain;Manchikanti;Pain Ther,2023

2. Consensus practice guidelines on interventions for cervical spine (facet) joint pain from a multispecialty international working group;Hurley;Reg Anesth Pain Med,2022

3. Ultrasound-guided cervical medial branch blocks: a systematic review and meta-analysis;Paredes;Ann Head Med,2020

4. Cervical medial branch block: a novel technique using ultrasound guidance;Finlayson;Reg Anesth Pain Med,2012

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3