Abstract
Abstract
The tariff-for-revenue argument has been invoked repeatedly in recent years to justify protectionism. It is motivated by the belief that a country with market power can use trade taxes to raise revenue from foreign consumers and producers. This paper develops a new sufficient statistics methodology to evaluate this claim for a wide range of countries. I show that (a) even large countries have limited market power. (b) So, before retaliation by trading partners, the average country can beneficially replace only 16% of its domestic tax revenues with trade taxes. (c) After retaliation, however, 50% of the collected trade tax revenues disappear, governments are forced to increase domestic taxes to counter their shrinking tax base, and real gross domestic product drops across-the-board by an average of 7%. On the flip side, these findings indicate (d) the gains from multilateral trade agreements are also 30% larger once we account for the fiscal cost of trade wars.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
General Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Reference41 articles.
1. “General Equilibrium Analysis of the Eaton–Kortum Model of International Trade.”;Alvarez;Journal of Monetary Economics,2007
2. “The Impact of the 2018 Trade War on US Prices and Welfare.”;Amiti,2019
3. “The Impact of the 2018 Trade War on US Prices and Welfare.”;Amiti,2019
4. “Trade Reform with a Government Budget Constraint.”;Anderson,1996
5. “Sufficient Statistics for Tariff Reform when Revenue Matters.”;Anderson;Journal of International Economics,2016
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献