Partisan Poll Watchers and Americans’ Perceptions of Electoral Fairness

Author:

Cohen Mollie J1ORCID,Sheagley Geoffrey2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Political Science, Purdue University Assistant Professor, , West Lafayette, IN, US

2. Department of Political Science, University of Georgia Associate Professor, , Athens, GA, US

Abstract

Abstract Poll watchers play an increasingly visible role in American elections, yet there is little research into how their presence shapes beliefs about electoral integrity. On the one hand, poll watchers—like other election observers—may lead voters to be more trusting in elections. On the other hand, poll watchers who expressly represent political parties may contribute to polarized views of electoral integrity. We address this gap with two conjoint experiments and one vignette experiment administered on large national samples. The conjoint experiments vary several features of election polling locations, including the presence of poll watchers, voter identification requirements, and other election regulations. We find that regulations around poll watchers shape views of election fairness, but that the nature of this influence depends on the type and partisanship of poll watchers who are present. The vignette experiment shows that perceptions of poll watchers decline when these individuals act in bad faith; effects are especially large for Republican respondents. These findings help identify the potential that poll watchers have to shape Americans’ beliefs about election fairness and integrity.

Funder

School of Public and International Affairs

Office of Research

University of Georgia

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Reference59 articles.

1. What Do We Learn about Voter Preferences from Conjoint Experiments?;Abramson;American Journal of Political Science,2022

2. Fraud, Convenience, and E-Voting: How Voting Experience Shapes Opinions about Voting Technology;Alvarez;Journal of Information Technology & Politics,2018

3. Losers' Consent

4. The Perils of Cherry Picking Low Frequency Events in Large Sample Surveys;Ansolabehere;Electoral Studies,2015

5. The Effect of Election Administration on Voter Confidence: A Local Matter?;Atkeson;PS: Political Science & Politics,2007

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3