A Matter of Misunderstanding? Explaining (Mis)Perceptions of Electoral Integrity across 25 Different Nations

Author:

Vliegenthart Rens1ORCID,Van Ham Carolien2ORCID,Kruikemeier Sanne1ORCID,Jacobs Kristof3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Professor, Strategic Communication Group, Wageningen University & Research , Wageningen, The Netherlands

2. Professor, Department of Political Science, Radboud University Nijmegen , Nijmegen, The Netherlands

3. Associate Professor, Department of Political Science, Radboud University Nijmegen , Nijmegen, The Netherlands

Abstract

Abstract In this paper, we investigate how trust in traditional and social media correlate with misperceptions of electoral integrity. Relying on insights from political communication research on exposure to misinformation and selective exposure mechanisms, as well as insights on the different roles of traditional and social media in different regime types, we argue that misperceptions of election integrity are likely driven in large part by the interplay between the trust people have in different media sources and the context (i.e., the level of press freedom) in which the elections take place. Using data from a survey conducted in 25 countries across the world, we find that trust in information from traditional media decreases misperceptions, while trust in information from social media increases misperceptions. However, both these effects are smaller when press freedom is restricted. In countries with low levels of press freedom, trust in social media is even associated with lower levels of misperceptions.

Funder

DATADRIVEN

NORFACE

Democratic Governance in a Turbulent Age

Economic and Social Research Council

Austrian Science Fund

Dutch Research Council

European Commission

Horizon 2020

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Reference51 articles.

1. What Do People Learn from Following the News? A Diary Study on the Influence of Media Use on Knowledge of Current News Stories;Beckers;European Journal of Communication,2021

2. Fact-Checking Trump’s Election Lies Can Improve Confidence in US Elections: Experimental Evidence;Bailard;Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review,2022

3. Election Administration and Perceptions of Fair Elections;Bowler;Electoral Studies,2015

4. The Promise and Limits of Election Observers in Building Election Credibility;Bush;The Journal of Politics,2017

5. Elite Rhetoric Can Undermine Democratic Norms;Clayton;PNAS,2021

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3