Affiliation:
1. Health Alliance International, Mozambique and University of Washington, USA
2. PATH
3. D’Eva Consulting
4. Gavi
5. Universidade Eduardo Mondlane
6. icddr,b
7. Health Alliance International, University of Washington
8. University of Zambia
9. Infectious Diseases Research Collaboration
10. IntraHealth
11. Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington
Abstract
Abstract
Vaccination, like most other public health services, relies on a complex package of intervention components, functioning systems and committed actors to achieve universal coverage. Despite significant investment in immunization programmes, national coverage trends have slowed and equity gaps have grown. This paper describes the design and implementation of the Gavi Full Country Evaluations, a multi-country, prospective, mixed-methods approach whose goal was to monitor and evaluate processes, inputs, outputs and outcomes of immunization programmes in Bangladesh, Mozambique, Uganda and Zambia. We implemented the Full Country Evaluations from 2013 to 2018 with the goal of identifying the drivers of immunization programme improvement to support programme implementation and increase equitable immunization coverage. The framework supported methodological and paradigmatic flexibility to respond to a broad range of evaluation and implementation research questions at global, national and cross-country levels, but was primarily underpinned by a focus on evaluating processes and identifying the root causes of implementation breakdowns. Process evaluation was driven by theories of change for each Gavi funding stream (e.g. Health Systems Strengthening) or activity, ranging from global policy development to district-level programme implementation. Mixing of methods increased in relevance and rigour over time as we learned to build multiple methods into increasingly tailored evaluation questions. Evaluation teams in country-based research institutes increasingly strengthened their level of embeddedness with immunization programmes as the emphasis shifted over time to focus more heavily on the use of findings for programme learning and adaptation. Based on our experiences implementing this approach, we recommend it for the evaluation of other complex interventions, health programmes or development assistance.
Funder
The Gavi Full Country Evaluations
Alliance for Health Policy and Systems Research
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Reference30 articles.
1. Framework for design and evaluation of complex interventions to improve health;Campbell;BMJ,2000
2. Lessons learned from implementing prospective, multicountry mixed methods evaluations for Gavi and the Global Fund;Carnahan;Global Health: Science and Practice,2020
3. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance;Craig;BMJ,2008
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献