How to evaluate the implementation of complex health programmes in low-income settings: the approach of the Gavi Full Country Evaluations

Author:

Soi Caroline1ORCID,Shearer Jessica C2,Budden Ashwin3,Carnahan Emily2,Salisbury Nicole2ORCID,Asiimwe Gilbert4,Chilundo Baltazar5,Sarma Haribondhu6,Gimbel Sarah7,Simuyemba Moses8,Uddin Jasim6,Masiye Felix8,Kamya Moses9,Hozumi Dai10,Rajaratnam Julie K2,Lim Stephen S11

Affiliation:

1. Health Alliance International, Mozambique and University of Washington, USA

2. PATH

3. D’Eva Consulting

4. Gavi

5. Universidade Eduardo Mondlane

6. icddr,b

7. Health Alliance International, University of Washington

8. University of Zambia

9. Infectious Diseases Research Collaboration

10. IntraHealth

11. Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington

Abstract

Abstract Vaccination, like most other public health services, relies on a complex package of intervention components, functioning systems and committed actors to achieve universal coverage. Despite significant investment in immunization programmes, national coverage trends have slowed and equity gaps have grown. This paper describes the design and implementation of the Gavi Full Country Evaluations, a multi-country, prospective, mixed-methods approach whose goal was to monitor and evaluate processes, inputs, outputs and outcomes of immunization programmes in Bangladesh, Mozambique, Uganda and Zambia. We implemented the Full Country Evaluations from 2013 to 2018 with the goal of identifying the drivers of immunization programme improvement to support programme implementation and increase equitable immunization coverage. The framework supported methodological and paradigmatic flexibility to respond to a broad range of evaluation and implementation research questions at global, national and cross-country levels, but was primarily underpinned by a focus on evaluating processes and identifying the root causes of implementation breakdowns. Process evaluation was driven by theories of change for each Gavi funding stream (e.g. Health Systems Strengthening) or activity, ranging from global policy development to district-level programme implementation. Mixing of methods increased in relevance and rigour over time as we learned to build multiple methods into increasingly tailored evaluation questions. Evaluation teams in country-based research institutes increasingly strengthened their level of embeddedness with immunization programmes as the emphasis shifted over time to focus more heavily on the use of findings for programme learning and adaptation. Based on our experiences implementing this approach, we recommend it for the evaluation of other complex interventions, health programmes or development assistance.

Funder

The Gavi Full Country Evaluations

Alliance for Health Policy and Systems Research

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Health Policy

Reference30 articles.

1. Framework for design and evaluation of complex interventions to improve health;Campbell;BMJ,2000

2. Lessons learned from implementing prospective, multicountry mixed methods evaluations for Gavi and the Global Fund;Carnahan;Global Health: Science and Practice,2020

3. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance;Craig;BMJ,2008

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3