Managing transitions from external assistance: cross-national learning about sustaining effective coverage

Author:

Shroff Zubin CyrusORCID,Sparkes Susan P12ORCID,Paina Ligia3,Skarphedinsdottir Maria4,Gotsadze George5ORCID,Zakumumpa Henry6,Tang Kun7ORCID,Perera Prasadini N89,Yuan MyMai1,Hanson Kara10

Affiliation:

1. World Health Organization, Department of Health Financing and Economics, World Health Organization , Avenue Appia 20, Geneva 1211, Switzerland

2. World Health Organization, Alliance for Health Policy and Systems Research , Avenue Appia 20, Geneva 1211, Switzerland

3. Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins University School of Public Health , Baltimore 21205, USA

4. UHC 2030, World Health Organization , Avenue Appia 20, Geneva 1211, Switzerland

5. Curatio International Foundation, Georgia and Ilia State University , 0179 Kavsadze str. 3, Office 5, Tbilisi, Georgia

6. Department of Health Policy, Planning and Management, Makerere University, School of Public Health , 7062 University Rd, Kampala, Uganda

7. Vanke School of Public Health, Tsinghua University , 30 Shuangqing Rd, Haidian District, Beijing 100190, China

8. Institute for Health Policy , 72, Park Street, Colombo 2, Sri Lanka

9. University of Peradeniya, Galaha Rd 20400 , Peradeniya, Sri Lanka

10. Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine , Keppel St, London WC1E 7HT, UK

Abstract

Abstract The often-prominent role of external assistance in health financing in low- and middle-income countries raises the question of how such resources can enable the sustained or even expanded coverage of key health services and initiatives even after donor funding is no longer available. In response to this question, this paper analyses the process and outcomes of donor transitions in health—where countries or regions within countries are no longer eligible to receive grants or concessional loans from external sources based on eligibility criteria or change in donor policy. The comparative analysis of multiple donor transitions in four countries—China, Georgia, Sri Lanka and Uganda—identifies 16 factors related to policy actors, policy process, the content of donor-funded initiatives and the broader political-economic context that were associated with sustained coverage of previously donor supported interventions. From a contextual standpoint, these factors relate to favourable economic and political environments for domestic systems to prioritize coverage for donor-supported interventions. Clear and transparent transition processes also enabled a smoother transition. How the donor-supported initiatives and services were organized within the context of the overall health system was found to be critically important, both before and during the transition process. This includes a targeted approach to integrate, strengthen and align key elements of the governance, financing, input management and service delivery arrangements with domestic systems. The findings of this analysis have important implications for how both donors and country policy makers can better structure external assistance that enables sustained coverage regardless of the source of funding. In particular, donors can better support sustained coverage through supporting long-term structural and institutional reform, clear co-financing policies, ensuring alignment with local salary scales and engaging with communities to ensure a continued focus on equitable access post-transition.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3