eHealth for service delivery in conflict: a narrative review of the application of eHealth technologies in contemporary conflict settings

Author:

Bowsher Gemma1,El Achi Nassim2,Augustin Katrin3,Meagher Kristen1,Ekzayez Abdulkarim1ORCID,Roberts Bayard4,Patel Preeti5

Affiliation:

1. R4HC-MENA, R4HSSS & Conflict & Health Research Group, King’s College London, Strand Ln, London WC2R 2LS, UK

2. R4HC-MENA, Global Health Institute, American University of Beirut, Beirut 1107 2020, Lebanon

3. School of Population Health & Environmental Sciences, King’s College London, Guy’s Campus, Great Maze Pond, London SE1 1UL, UK

4. RECAP, Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, UK

5. R4HC-MENA & R4HSSS, Dept War Studies, King’s College London, Strand Lane, LondonWC2R 2LS, UK

Abstract

Abstract The role of eHealth in conflict settings is increasingly important to address geographic, epidemiologic and clinical disparities. This study categorizes various forms of eHealth usage in conflict and aims to identify gaps in evidence to make recommendations for further research and practice. The analysis was carried out via a narrative hermeneutic review methodology. Articles that fulfilled the following screening criteria were reviewed: (1) describing an eHealth intervention in active conflict or ongoing insurgency, (2) an eHealth intervention targeting a conflict-affected population, (3) an e-learning platform for delivery in conflict settings and (4) non-interventional descriptive reviews relating to eHealth in conflict. Of the 489 papers eligible for screening, 46 merited final inclusion. Conflict settings described include Somalia, Sudan, Afghanistan, Syria, Iraq, Pakistan, Chechnya, Gaza and the Democratic Republic of Congo. Thirty-six studies described specific eHealth initiatives, while the remainder were more generic review papers exploring general principles. Analysis resulted in the elucidation of three final categories of current eHealth activity in conflict-affected settings: (1) eHealth for clinical management, (2) e-learning for healthcare in conflict and (3) eHealth for information management in conflict. Obvious disparities in the distribution of technological dividends from eHealth in conflict are demonstrated by this review. Conflict-affected populations are predominantly subject to ad hoc and voluntary initiatives delivered by diaspora and civil society organizations. While the deployment of eHealth technologies in conflict settings is increasingly normalized, there is a need for further clarification of global norms relating to practice in this context.

Funder

Research for Health in Conflict in the Middle East and North Africa

Research capacity strengthening and knowledge generation

National Institute for Health Research

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Health Policy

Reference54 articles.

1. E-health in the Eastern Mediterranean Region: a decade of challenges and achievements;Al Shorbaji;EMHJ-Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal,2008

2. Tele-cardiology in the Syrian War;Alrifai;Journal of the American College of Cardiology,2018

3. COVID-19 and the rise of participatory SIGINT: an examination of the rise in government surveillance through mobile applications;Bernard;American Journal ofPublic Health,2020

4. Telemedicine in trauma and disasters--from war to earthquake: are we ready?;Benner;Studies in Health Technology and Informatics,2004

5. A hermeneutic approach for conducting literature reviews and literature searches;Boell;Communications of the Association for Information Systems,2014

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3