Affiliation:
1. Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health , 615 N Wolfe St, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
Abstract
Abstract
The misreporting of administrative health data creates an inequitable distribution of scarce health resources and weakens transparency and accountability within health systems. In the mid-2010s, an Indian state introduced a district ranking system to monitor the monthly performance of health programmes alongside a set of data quality initiatives. However, questions remain about the role of data manipulation in compromising the accuracy of data available for decision-making. We used qualitative approaches to examine the opportunities, pressures and rationalization of potential data manipulation. Using purposive sampling, we interviewed 48 district-level respondents from high-, middle- and low-ranked districts and 35 division- and state-level officials, all of whom had data-related or programme monitoring responsibilities. Additionally, we observed 14 district-level meetings where administrative data were reviewed. District respondents reported that the quality of administrative data was sometimes compromised to achieve top district rankings. The pressure to exaggerate progress was a symptom of the broader system for assessing health performance that was often viewed as punitive and where district- and state-level superiors were viewed as having limited ability to ensure accountability for data quality. However, district respondents described being held accountable for results despite lacking the adequate capacity to deliver on them. Many rationalized data manipulation to cope with high pressures, to safeguard their jobs and, in some cases, for personal financial gain. Moreover, because data manipulation was viewed as a socially acceptable practice, ethical arguments against it were less effective. Potential entry points to mitigate data manipulation include (1) changing the incentive structures to place equal emphasis on the quality of data informing the performance data (e.g. district rankings), (2) strengthening checks and balances to reinforce the integrity of data-related processes within districts and (3) implementing policies to make data manipulation an unacceptable anomaly rather than a norm.
Funder
Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Reference43 articles.
1. PRISM framework: a paradigm shift for designing, strengthening and evaluating routine health information systems;Aqil;Health Policy and Planning,2009
2. Improving the routine HMIS in Nigeria through mobile technology for community data collection;Asangansi;Journal of Health Informatics in Developing Countries,2013
3. A mobile-based community health management information system for community health workers and their supervisors in 2 Districts of Zambia;Biemba;Global Health: Science and Practice,2017
4. A purposeful approach to the constant comparative method in the analysis of qualitative interviews;Boeije;Quality & Quantity,2002
5. Introduction and evaluation of an electronic tool for improved data quality and data use during malaria case management supportive supervision;Burnett;The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene,2019
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献