Factors influencing the prioritization of vaccines by policymakers in low- and middle-income countries: a scoping review

Author:

Guillaume Dominique123ORCID,Meyer Diane34,Waheed Dur-e-Nayab5,Schlieff Meike16,Muralidharan Kirthini16,Chou Victoria B16,Limaye Rupali16ORCID

Affiliation:

1. International Vaccine Access Center, Johns Hopkins University , 415 N Washington St. 5th floor, Baltimore, MD 21231, USA

2. Jhpiego, a Johns Hopkins University Affiliate , 1615 Thames St. # 200, Baltimore, MD 21231, USA

3. School of Nursing, Johns Hopkins University , 525 N. Wolfe St., Baltimore, MD 21205, USA

4. Center for Health Security, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health , 621 E. Pratt St., Baltimore, MD 21201, USA

5. Center for the Evaluation of Vaccination, University of Antwerp , Drie Eikenstraat 663, Antwerp, Edegem 2650, Belgium

6. Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health , 615 N. Wolfe St. Suite E8527, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA

Abstract

Abstract Vaccination decision making in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) has become increasingly complex, particularly in the context of numerous competing health challenges. LMICs have to make difficult choices on which vaccines to prioritize for introduction while considering a wide range of factors such as disease burden, vaccine impact, vaccine characteristics, financing and health care infrastructures, whilst adapting to each country’s specific contexts. Our scoping review reviewed the factors that influence decision-making among policymakers for the introduction of new vaccines in LMICs. We identified the specific data points that are factored into the decision-making process for new vaccine introduction, whilst also documenting whether there have been any changes in decision-making criteria in new vaccine introduction over the last two decades. A comprehensive database search was conducted using a search strategy consisting of key terms and Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) phrases related to policy, decision-making, vaccine introduction, immunization programmes and LMICs. Articles were screened following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. A total of 843 articles were identified, with 34 articles retained after abstract screening, full-text screening and grading with the mixed methods appraisal tool (MMAT). The Burchett framework for new vaccine introduction was used to identify indicators for vaccine-decision making and guided data extraction. Articles in our study represented a diverse range of perspectives and methodologies. Across articles, the importance of the disease, which included disease burden, costs of disease and political prioritization, coupled with economic factors related to vaccine price, affordability and financing were the most common criteria considered for new vaccine introduction. Our review identified two additional criteria in the decision-making process for vaccine introduction that were not included in the Burchett framework: communication and sociocultural considerations. Data from this review can support informed decision-making for vaccine introduction amongst policymakers and stakeholders in LMICs.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Health Policy

Reference69 articles.

1. Human papillomavirus vaccination in South Africa: programmatic challenges and opportunities for integration with other adolescent health services?;Amponsah-Dacosta;Frontiers in Public Health,2022

2. 8.2 Concepts and considerations for mixed methods systematic reviews;Aromataris,2017

3. The role of National Immunization Technical Advisory Groups (NITAGs) in the introduction of inactivated polio vaccine: experience of the Indonesia and Uganda NITAGs;Ba-Nguz;The Journal of Infectious Diseases,2017

4. Supporting national immunization technical advisory groups (NITAGs) in resource-constrained settings. New strategies and lessons learned from the Task Force for Global Health’s Partnership for influenza vaccine introduction;Ba-Nguz;Vaccine,2019

5. Value and effectiveness of National Immunization Technical Advisory Groups in low- and middle-income countries: a qualitative study of global and national perspectives;Bell;Health Policy and Planning,2019

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3