Methodological reflections on health system-oriented assessment of maternity care in 16 hospitals in sub-Saharan Africa: an embedded case study

Author:

Asefa Anteneh1ORCID,Dossou Jean-Paul2ORCID,Hanson Claudia34ORCID,Hounsou Christelle Boyi2ORCID,Namazzi Gertrude5,Meja Samuel6ORCID,Mkoka Dickson Ally7,Agballa Gottfried2,Babirye Josephine5,Semaan Aline1ORCID,Annerstedt Kristi Sidney3ORCID,Delvaux Thérèse1ORCID,Marchal Bruno1ORCID,Van Belle Sara1ORCID,Pleguezuelo Virginia Castellano18ORCID,Beňová Lenka1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Public Health, Institute of Tropical Medicine , Antwerp, Belgium

2. Department of Health Policy and Systems, Centre de Recherche en Reproduction Humaine et en Démographie (CERRHUD) , Cotonou, Benin

3. Department of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet , Solna, Sweden

4. Department of Disease Control, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine , London, UK

5. Centre of Excellence for Maternal Newborn and Child Health, Department of Health Policy Planning and Management, School of Public Health, Makerere University , Kampala, Uganda

6. The Centre for Reproductive Health, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences , Blantyre, Malawi

7. Department of Clinical Nursing, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences , Dar es Salaam, Tanzania

8. Department of Public Health, Environments and Society, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine , London, UK

Abstract

Abstract Health facility assessments (HFAs) assessing facilities’ readiness to provide services are well-established. However, HFA questionnaires are typically quantitative and lack depth to understand systems in which health facilities operate—crucial to designing context-oriented interventions. We report lessons from a multiple embedded case study exploring the experiences of HFA data collectors in implementing a novel HFA tool developed using systems thinking approach. We assessed 16 hospitals in four countries (Benin, Malawi, Tanzania and Uganda) as part of a quality improvement implementation research. Our tool was organized in 17 sections and included dimensions of hospital governance, leadership and financing; maternity care standards and procedures; ongoing quality improvement practices; interactions with communities and mapping of the areas related to maternal care. Data for this study were collected using in-depth interviews with senior experts who conducted the HFA in the countries 1–3 months after completion of the HFAs. Data were analysed using the inductive thematic analysis approach. Our HFA faced challenges in logistics (accessing key hospital-based respondents, high turnover of managerial staff and difficulty accessing information considered sensitive in the context) and methodology (response bias, lack of data quality and data entry into an electronic platform). Data elements of governance, leadership and financing were the most affected. Opportunities and strategies adopted aimed at enhancing data collection (building on prior partnerships and understanding local and institutional bureaucracies) and enhancing data richness (identifying respondents with institutional memory, learning from experience and conducting observations at various times). Moreover, HFA data collectors conducted abstraction of records and interviews in a flexible and adaptive way to enhance data quality. Lessons and new skills learned from our HFA could be used as inputs to respond to the growing need of integrating the systems thinking approach in HFA to improve the contextual understanding of operations and structure.

Funder

European Union

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Health Policy

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3